On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:09 -0700, Jarrett Lu wrote:
> Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 10:32 -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 10:12 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> While leaving large chunks of the protocol out of the specification
> >>> definitely makes
Paul Moore wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 10:32 -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 10:12 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
I would encourage you to publish the LFS draft as soon as possible so
that we can take a look at both specifications together since the IKE
draft does have s
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 10:32 -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 10:12 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > I would encourage you to publish the LFS draft as soon as possible so
> > that we can take a look at both specifications together since the IKE
> > draft does have some reliance on
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 10:12 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:37 -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:36 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 08:18 -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:49 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
>
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:37 -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:36 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 08:18 -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:49 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 00:30 -0700, jarrett...@oracle.co
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:36 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 08:18 -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:49 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 00:30 -0700, jarrett...@oracle.com wrote:
> > > > A new 00 version of IKEv2 extension for security l
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 08:18 -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:49 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 00:30 -0700, jarrett...@oracle.com wrote:
> > > A new 00 version of IKEv2 extension for security label has just been
> > > published:
> > >
> > > http://tool
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:49 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 00:30 -0700, jarrett...@oracle.com wrote:
> > A new 00 version of IKEv2 extension for security label has just been
> > published:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jml-ipsec-ikev2-security-label-00
> >
> > Author
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 00:30 -0700, jarrett...@oracle.com wrote:
> A new 00 version of IKEv2 extension for security label has just been
> published:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jml-ipsec-ikev2-security-label-00
>
> Authors welcome comments from IPsec community.
Having just read the draf
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 19:26 +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2010, at 9:30 AM, jarrett...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> > A new 00 version of IKEv2 extension for security label has just been
> > published:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jml-ipsec-ikev2-security-label-00
> >
> > Authors wel
On 07/28/10 09:26 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
On Jul 28, 2010, at 9:30 AM, jarrett...@oracle.com wrote:
A new 00 version of IKEv2 extension for security label has just been
published:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jml-ipsec-ikev2-security-label-00
Authors welcome comments from IPsec community.
On Jul 28, 2010, at 9:30 AM, jarrett...@oracle.com wrote:
> A new 00 version of IKEv2 extension for security label has just been
> published:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jml-ipsec-ikev2-security-label-00
>
> Authors welcome comments from IPsec community.
>
> Thanks.
You will get tha
A new 00 version of IKEv2 extension for security label has just been
published:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jml-ipsec-ikev2-security-label-00
Authors welcome comments from IPsec community.
Thanks.
- Jarrett
___
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
13 matches
Mail list logo