On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:49 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 00:30 -0700, jarrett...@oracle.com wrote: > > A new 00 version of IKEv2 extension for security label has just been > > published: > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jml-ipsec-ikev2-security-label-00 > > > > Authors welcome comments from IPsec community. > > Having just read the draft I think it is a bit difficult to perform any > in-depth review without the LFS document (which is described as a work > in progress); there just isn't any real substance in this draft in my > opinion. >
What sort of substance are you looking for? The whole point of the LFS document was that we could abstract the actual semantics and format of labeling away and focus on the actual protocol instead. The Labeled IPSec document should be able to be looked at without having to do so in the context of a specific label type. Dave _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
