Personal feelings about kernel developers aside, mercurial requires
two commands to get a new working copy, git takes one. So ease of use
for who? Contributors pushing commits or downstream?
I'm going to bow out of this discussion now, because it's pretty clear
that there's no real differen
>Also there are enough cross-platform projects using git to suggest
>that Windows support for git is no longer an issue. Sure enough, a
>quick search shows three separate projects providing a non-cygwin git
>client (mingwgit, msysgit, and tortoisegit) so where is the problem in
>supporting microso
On 3/19/10, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
>
> Ease of use and kernel hackers don't exactly go hand-in-hand. :)
Personal feelings about kernel developers aside, mercurial requires
two commands to get a new working copy, git takes one. So ease of use
for who? Contributors pushing commits or downstream?
Hi guys,
where can I download the code responsible for downloading aas files?
are there any docs describing quake3 aas topic?
regards,
flipper!
___
ioquake3 mailing list
ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org
http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org
I want to drop a general note and I say I think a lot of thinking is
spent in this list about 'surface' things while no much is going on
code-wise.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
>> If it comes down to working around
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
> If it comes down to working around an annoying Windows quirk or not
> supporting Windows, which do you think they'll do?
>
> --ryan.
Sure, "they" aren't concerned with git/Windows support, but there are
contributors for whom Windows _is_ a
Since your reasons include ease of use and support, git has a very,
very, very strong point. The bulk of most skillful hackers in open
source community (linux kernel), use it and update it.
Ease of use and kernel hackers don't exactly go hand-in-hand. :)
Also, I can point to dozens of emails
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Zachary wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
>> > Zachary wrote:
>> >> Hey everybody,
>> >> (Hi Doctor Zach!)
>> >>
>> >> I don't think I've said this yet, but I should:
>> >> At some point in the future we're switchin
> Also, Windows has excellent git support:
> http://code.google.com/p/gitextensions/ (I use this on a daily basis,
> plugs
> right into Visual Studio if you want it to).
>
> Cheers
> James
(which would make more sense if ioq3 had a real working .sln but it has
one that only kinda works so not a hu
Also, with git we could have an official mirror over at GitHub (damn
popular) which might pull a few more punters in.
James
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Laurent Desnogues <
laurent.desnog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Time for a summary:
>
> http://gitvsmercurial.com/
>
> I took a quick look at wh
Time for a summary:
http://gitvsmercurial.com/
I took a quick look at what Mercurial can do, and though
I'm in favor of git (due to my lack of experience with hg),
it looks good enough for my needs. At first sight the only
thing that looks scary with hg is branch deletion.
Laurent
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 00:57, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
> This is why moving away from Subversion makes sense...
> http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/2010-February/075191.html
>
> This is why I chose hg over git for the SDL project...
> http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/2
On 19/03/2010 09:40, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Zachary wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
>>> Zachary wrote:
Hey everybody,
(Hi Doctor Zach!)
I don't think I've said this yet, but I should:
At some point in the future we're switching to Mercurial.
>>>
Hi
I don't usually chip into these mailing list conversations but today I'll
make an exception. This looks like it is just going to turn into an argument
of personal preference and opinion - surely you should be choosing the VCS
that is most accessible... you want people to use/contribute to ioqua
Zachary wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> > Zachary wrote:
> >> Hey everybody,
> >> (Hi Doctor Zach!)
> >>
> >> I don't think I've said this yet, but I should:
> >> At some point in the future we're switching to Mercurial.
> >
> > Why? What about git?
>
> I need somet
> I tend to subject to the choices of the benevolent dictator in this
> kind of thing.
>
>
2nd'd
___
ioquake3 mailing list
ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org
http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org
By sending this message I agree to love ioquak
On 19/03/2010 07:41, Michael Menegakis wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
>> This is why I chose hg over git for the SDL project...
>> http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/2010-February/075192.html
>
> Since your reasons include ease of use and support, gi
17 matches
Mail list logo
