Hi,
On 1/10/20 6:06 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
+static void register_pasid_allocator(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
+{
+ if (!intel_iommu_sm) {
Use sm_supported(iommu) instead.
sounds good, seems we could separate the sm code more cleanly in the
future to avoid all these checks.
Agreed.
Best
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:10:55 +0800
Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/17/19 3:24 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > When VT-d driver runs in the guest, PASID allocation must be
> > performed via virtual command interface. This patch registers a
> > custom IOASID allocator which takes precedence over the defa
Hi,
On 12/17/19 3:24 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
When VT-d driver runs in the guest, PASID allocation must be
performed via virtual command interface. This patch registers a
custom IOASID allocator which takes precedence over the default
XArray based allocator. The resulting IOASID allocation will alwa
When VT-d driver runs in the guest, PASID allocation must be
performed via virtual command interface. This patch registers a
custom IOASID allocator which takes precedence over the default
XArray based allocator. The resulting IOASID allocation will always
come from the host. This ensures that PASI
