On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:10:55 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 12/17/19 3:24 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > When VT-d driver runs in the guest, PASID allocation must be
> > performed via virtual command interface. This patch registers a
> > custom IOASID allocator which takes precedence over the default
> > XArray based allocator. The resulting IOASID allocation will always
> > come from the host. This ensures that PASID namespace is system-
> > wide.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 75
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  2 ++ 2 files changed, 77
> > insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c index e90102c7540d..b0c0bb6f740e
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > @@ -1700,6 +1700,9 @@ static void free_dmar_iommu(struct
> > intel_iommu *iommu) if (ecap_prs(iommu->ecap))
> >                     intel_svm_finish_prq(iommu);
> >     }
> > +   if (ecap_vcs(iommu->ecap) && vccap_pasid(iommu->vccap))
> > +
> > ioasid_unregister_allocator(&iommu->pasid_allocator); +
> >   #endif
> >   }
> >   
> > @@ -3181,6 +3184,75 @@ static int copy_translation_tables(struct
> > intel_iommu *iommu) return ret;
> >   }
> >   
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> > +static ioasid_t intel_ioasid_alloc(ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max,
> > void *data) +{
> > +   struct intel_iommu *iommu = data;
> > +   ioasid_t ioasid;
> > +  
> 
> Check !iommu just like the free api?
> 
sounds good, will return INVALID_IOASID if NULL.

> > +   /*
> > +    * VT-d virtual command interface always uses the full 20
> > bit
> > +    * PASID range. Host can partition guest PASID range based
> > on
> > +    * policies but it is out of guest's control.
> > +    */
> > +   if (min < PASID_MIN || max > intel_pasid_max_id)
> > +           return INVALID_IOASID;
> > +
> > +   if (vcmd_alloc_pasid(iommu, &ioasid))
> > +           return INVALID_IOASID;
> > +
> > +   return ioasid;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void intel_ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid, void *data)
> > +{
> > +   struct intel_iommu *iommu = data;
> > +
> > +   if (!iommu)
> > +           return;
> > +   /*
> > +    * Sanity check the ioasid owner is done at upper layer,
> > e.g. VFIO
> > +    * We can only free the PASID when all the devices are
> > unbound.
> > +    */
> > +   if (ioasid_find(NULL, ioasid, NULL)) {
> > +           pr_alert("Cannot free active IOASID %d\n", ioasid);
> > +           return;
> > +   }
> > +   vcmd_free_pasid(iommu, ioasid);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void register_pasid_allocator(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> > +{
> > +   if (!intel_iommu_sm) {  
> 
> Use sm_supported(iommu) instead.
> 
sounds good, seems we could separate the sm code more cleanly in the
future to avoid all these checks.

> > +           pr_warn("VT-d scalable mode not enabled\n");
> > +           return;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * Register a custom PASID allocator if we are running in
> > a guest,
> > +    * guest PASID must be obtained via virtual command
> > interface.
> > +    * There can be multiple vIOMMUs in each guest but only
> > one allocator
> > +    * is active. All vIOMMU allocators will eventually be
> > calling the same
> > +    * host allocator.
> > +    */
> > +   if (ecap_vcs(iommu->ecap) && vccap_pasid(iommu->vccap)) {
> > +           pr_info("Register custom PASID allocator\n");
> > +           iommu->pasid_allocator.alloc = intel_ioasid_alloc;
> > +           iommu->pasid_allocator.free = intel_ioasid_free;
> > +           iommu->pasid_allocator.pdata = (void *)iommu;
> > +           if
> > (!ioasid_register_allocator(&iommu->pasid_allocator)) {
> > +                   pr_warn("Custom PASID allocator failed,
> > scalable mode disabled\n");
> > +                   /*
> > +                    * Disable scalable mode on this IOMMU if
> > there
> > +                    * is no custom allocator. Mixing SM
> > capable vIOMMU
> > +                    * and non-SM vIOMMU are not supported.
> > +                    */
> > +                   intel_iommu_sm = 0;
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> >   static int __init init_dmars(void)
> >   {
> >     struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
> > @@ -3298,6 +3370,9 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
> >      */
> >     for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
> >             iommu_flush_write_buffer(iommu);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> > +           register_pasid_allocator(iommu);
> > +#endif
> >             iommu_set_root_entry(iommu);
> >             iommu->flush.flush_context(iommu, 0, 0, 0,
> > DMA_CCMD_GLOBAL_INVL); iommu->flush.flush_iotlb(iommu, 0, 0, 0,
> > DMA_TLB_GLOBAL_FLUSH); diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h index 1e11560b0e59..8c30b23bd838
> > 100644 --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/iommu.h>
> >   #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> >   #include <linux/dmar.h>
> > +#include <linux/ioasid.h>
> >   
> >   #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> >   #include <asm/iommu.h>
> > @@ -557,6 +558,7 @@ struct intel_iommu {
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> >     struct page_req_dsc *prq;
> >     unsigned char prq_name[16];    /* Name for PRQ interrupt
> > */
> > +   struct ioasid_allocator_ops pasid_allocator; /* Custom
> > allocator for PASIDs */ #endif
> >     struct q_inval  *qi;            /* Queued invalidation
> > info */ u32 *iommu_state; /* Store iommu states between suspend and
> > resume.*/ 
> 
> Best regards,
> baolu

[Jacob Pan]
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to