Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Discussion] Why can constructors violate LSP?

rs than their supertypes. In addition, omitting > creators makes it easy for a type to have multiple implementations, allows > new creators to be added later, and re ects common usage: for example, Java > interfaces and virtual types provide no way for users to create objects of > the type. (Creators is Liskov's word for constructors, which they later define in the paper.) Hope that helps. - Mark Trapp -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Discussion] Why can constructors violate LSP?

he creators are missing. Omitting creators allows subtypes to = provide different creators than their supertypes. In addition, omitting cre= ators makes it easy for a type to have multiple implementations, allows new= creators to be added later, and re ects common usage: for example, Java in= terfaces and virtual types provide no way for users to create objects of th= e type. (Creators is Liskov's word for constructors, which they later define in the paper.) Hope that helps. - Mark Trapp -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Deprecate declare(encoding='...') + zend.multibyte + zend.script_encoding + zend.detect_unicode ?

ases, including the pre-release ones. - Mark Trapp -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC idea: using the void type to control maximum arity of user-defined functions

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 5:43 AM Pablo Rauzy wrote: > > Hello all, > > First, I'm new here, so let me start by warmly thanking everyone > involved in PHP development. I've started programming 22 years using it > as my first programming language, and still enjoy using it a lot :). > > I've read the r

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC idea: using the void type to control maximum arity of user-defined functions

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:16 PM Bilge wrote: > > On 04/04/2024 16:57, Tim Düsterhus wrote: >> I think it would be reasonable to consider deprecating passing extra >> arguments to a non-variadic function. > > This seems like the only reasonable thing to do, to me. If this were the > case, there sh

Re: External Message: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Vote announcement] Property hooks

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:59 AM Jeffrey Dafoe wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:01 PM Erick de Azevedo Lima > > wrote: > > Maybe if such a feedback was given before and it was decided to go for a > > trimmed version of the feature, maybe Ilija/Larry could h

Re: [PHP-DEV] [Early Feedback] Pattern matching

icult to think of an implementation of regular expressions without matching groups, and similarly it would be difficult to think of a useful implementation of pattern matching without the ability to extract the data from the matched data structure. Because of this, every language that implements the concept also includes binding. Hope this helps, Mark Trapp