Rowan Collins in php.internals (Fri, 22 Jun 2018 23:40:27 +0100):
>However, it seems that the package without a d is actually abandoned.
>The official PECL package was last released more than 5 years ago [3],
>and the bug asking for PHP 7 compatibility is still open [4]. An
>unofficial fork appa
Someone was asking about memcache vs memached on IRC the other day and I
advised them the memcache extension looked abandoned based on the PECL
page. Having 2 such similar extensions is confusing - It would also be
nice if someone could document the major differences between the 2
extensions so
Hi internals,
Based on some recent conversations, I'm getting the impression that after
PHP 7.3, we might want to go for PHP 8 next.
I'd like to discuss and possibility decide this now, as that would make PHP
7.3 the last chance to get in deprecations.
Nikita
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Based on some recent conversations, I'm getting the impression that after
> PHP 7.3, we might want to go for PHP 8 next.
>
> I'd like to discuss and possibility decide this now, as that would make PHP
> 7.3 the last chance to get in deprecatio
> -Original Message-
> From: p...@golemon.com [mailto:p...@golemon.com] On Behalf Of Sara
> Golemon
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2018 1:07 AM
> To: Nikita Popov
> Cc: PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 8 next?
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> > Based on s
On 06/23/2018 03:11 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
-Original Message-
From: p...@golemon.com [mailto:p...@golemon.com] On Behalf Of Sara
Golemon
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2018 1:07 AM
To: Nikita Popov
Cc: PHP internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 8 next?
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Nikita
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 6:39 PM Alice Wonder wrote:
> On 06/23/2018 03:11 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: p...@golemon.com [mailto:p...@golemon.com] On Behalf Of Sara
> >> Golemon
> >> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2018 1:07 AM
> >> To: Nikita Popov
> >> Cc: P
Hello,
> On Jun 23, 2018, at 6:38 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
>
>> On 06/23/2018 03:11 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>>
>> This is slightly earlier than I intended to bring it up but I do too think
>> that the next version beyond 7.3 should be 8.
>
> I disagree.
>
> I'm mostly a user, not a PHP devel
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
>> > Based on some recent conversations, I'm getting the impression that
>> > after PHP 7.3, we might want to go for PHP 8 next.
>> >
>> > I'd like to discuss and possibility decide this n
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 4:11 PM Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: p...@golemon.com [mailto:p...@golemon.com] On Behalf Of Sara
> > Golemon
> > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2018 1:07 AM
> > To: Nikita Popov
> > Cc: PHP internals
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 8 next?
>
Hi
Den søn. 24. jun. 2018 kl. 02.59 skrev Levi Morrison :
> Neither JIT nor FFI require backwards compatibility breaks in
> language. I don't think either of those particular features would
> substantially break the C API either. If these are the motivations for
> PHP 8 then I strongly object.
I
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 3:23 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> Hi internals,
>
> Based on some recent conversations, I'm getting the impression that after
> PHP 7.3, we might want to go for PHP 8 next.
>
> I'd like to discuss and possibility decide this now, as that would make PHP
> 7.3 the last chance t
> Neither JIT nor FFI require backwards compatibility breaks in language. I
> don't
> think either of those particular features would substantially break the C API
> either. If these are the motivations for PHP 8 then I strongly object.
Backwards compatibility breakages have never been the trigge
13 matches
Mail list logo
