On 20/11/2016 20:25, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
Reading through the RFC and the replies, I'm confused about this question.
Why would the comparison operators work any differently on immutable
objects?
If these were value objects, the question would make sense, but it doesn't
sound like that's what
@Rasmus
We are not changing behaviour of operators since we are not dealing here
just with Value Objects.
It's not even a question that matter of this RFC can be achieved with
encapsulation. Already there are couple of features that got passed, which
also could be achieved without 'syntax' sugar,
On 21/11/16 08:46, Mathieu Rochette wrote:
>> The term 'immutable", especially for the property-annotation, doesn't
>> strictly seem correct to me either, as for example, I can annotate a
>> public
>> property as immutable, but if I put an object in there, that object is
>> not
>> necessarily immut
Morning Internals,
I'd like to announce a RFC to allow omitting the type declarations for
parameters in subclasses:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/parameter-no-type-variance
PHP doesn't currently allow variance for parameters as checking these for
compatibility isn't possible on compile time.
This limi
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:40 AM Niklas Keller wrote:
> Morning Internals,
>
> I'd like to announce a RFC to allow omitting the type declarations for
> parameters in subclasses:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/parameter-no-type-variance
>
> PHP doesn't currently allow variance for parameters as checkin
What happens if the method signature is defined within an interface? I
would consider that method signature a contract and one that should not
be able to be overwritten.
--
Daniel Morris
dan...@honestempire.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http:/
2016-11-21 11:00 GMT+01:00 Daniel Morris :
> What happens if the method signature is defined within an interface?
Just the same as for every class. Having other rules for interfaces doesn't
make sense.
Imagine the following example:
interface I { function foo(array $foo); }
class C1 implements
On 21.11.2016 at 10:39, Niklas Keller wrote:
> I'd like to announce a RFC to allow omitting the type declarations for
> parameters in subclasses:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/parameter-no-type-variance
>
> PHP doesn't currently allow variance for parameters as checking these for
> compatibility isn
Hi
2016-11-18 15:55 GMT+01:00 Nikita Popov :
> Hi internals!
>
> I've submitted this RFC for PHP 7.1 previously, but didn't follow through
> due to time constraints. Now I'd like to propose an extended version for
> PHP 7.2 and vote on it sooner rather than later to avoid a repeat
> performance.
>
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Net Mo wrote:
> Hi PHP!
>
> I'm willing to write some awesome RFCs to make PHP great again, I'll build
> a wall and it'll be tremendous. Very very great. :-P
>
> But I'll start with something simple first :-P it is about improving
> ArrayIterator (you can find a d
Results for project PHP master, build date 2016-11-21 13:49:02+02:00
commit: 51f5973
previous commit:b6ed319
revision date: 2016-11-21 13:13:28+03:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores,
stepping 2, LLC 45 MB
On 11/21/2016 10:39 AM, Niklas Keller wrote:
> Morning Internals,
>
> I'd like to announce a RFC to allow omitting the type declarations for
> parameters in subclasses:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/parameter-no-type-variance
>
> PHP doesn't currently allow variance for parameters as checking these
Hi!
> Nothing prevents it? As far as I'm aware there's no current way to type
> hint Countable or array.
No, there's not - as there's no way to make other complex type
conditions as type. You still can check for it, or just use count().
> How would one add an interface that includes Countable an
Hi!
On 11/16/16 3:06 PM, Adam Baratz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No, you're not misreading the subject line. I began working on the docs for
> the previously accepted proposal and became uncomfortable with the
> approach. I think it will be better to integrate this info into
> PDOStatement::debugDumpParams(
Hi!
On 11/15/16 8:13 AM, Dominic Grostate wrote:
> I think this may have been discussed before, but I was largely dismissed
> because no one though it would be possible to implement.
>
> However assuming it is possible, what is the general feeling towards
> function overloading, as seen in C# and
Hi!
> a typical use case would be
>
> class EventHandler {
> public function handle(ProductCreated $event) {
> ...
> }
> public function handle(ProductNameChanged $event) {
> ...
> }
> }
>
> vs what's currently being done:
>
> class EventHandler {
> public fu
Morning internals,
We have in the root of the repository a script named "makerpm".
Other than token changes (changing php5 to php7) it hasn't been properly
maintained, and I have to guess that this is because nobody is using it.
Possibly I'm wrong about it being out of date, and there are some w
17 matches
Mail list logo
