Hi! On 11/16/16 3:06 PM, Adam Baratz wrote: > Hi, > > No, you're not misreading the subject line. I began working on the docs for > the previously accepted proposal and became uncomfortable with the > approach. I think it will be better to integrate this info into > PDOStatement::debugDumpParams(). It will let me do the testing I want to do > without introducing a new API, which was the primary concern expressed in > the previous discussion. > > I reverted the code I'd committed, updated the RFC with an example, and > reset the vote: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/debugging_pdo_prepared_statement_emulation
I don't think this is how RFC process is supposed to work. If the proposal is not mature enough, it should be discussed or worked on more. Committing it, then reverting it and immediately starting another vote is definitely not what should be done. It looks highly irregular and suggests that this is not mature enough. Also, jumping right into the vote is definitely not how it should work. If anything, more discussion period is needed to see why the approach that was accepted is not good enough, and to ensure the errors made on the previous one are not repeated. -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
