Den 2015-08-19 kl. 19:15, skrev Anatol Belski:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:sebast...@php.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 4:21 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: bump versions: configure.in
main/php_version
Hi,
2015-08-18 19:18 GMT-03:00 Christoph Becker :
> On 18.08.2015 at 22:47, Arne Blankerts wrote:
>
>> while playing around with the new group use syntax, I stumbled upon an
>> inconsistency of which I'm not sure whether or not it is expected.
>> For the "classic" syntax, while technically pointle
Results for project php-src-nightly, build date 2015-08-20 05:00:00+03:00
commit: 7373da78fea6130bffad75bfeff3d2cdce0ddba3
revision_date:2015-08-19 22:27:39+02:00
environment: Haswell-EP
cpu: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping 2,
LLC 45 MB
Hi Andone
Is there a way to better send the results maybe csv attachment or dump some
where.
I can build a small integration.
+1
Pasindu
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Andone, Bogdan
wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christopher Jones [mailto:christopher.jo...@oracle.com]
> > S
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>> A) Adding those defines prior to including stdint.h
>> B) Expecting C++ ext devs to define those before including php.h
>> C) Modifying zend_long.h to use things like
>> std::numeric_limits() when __cplusplus is defined
>>
>> A may (pot
Hi!
> Second question, is it too late to put it in 7.0.0?
> Happy enough to put it behind #ifdef __cplusplus to limit the exposed
> surface area.
That doesn't look like a radical change, so unless RM (or somebody
else?) disapproves my opinion is it can be in 7.0.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@gmai
(sorry for top posting)
Hi Sara,
I think such will be just fine for RC2, unless Anatol got any object, go
ahead.
-K
On Aug 20, 2015 6:49 PM, "Sara Golemon" wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Stanislav Malyshev
> wrote:
> >> A) Adding those defines prior to including stdint.h
> >> B) Ex
Hi!
> Hm... But isn't then the safe route to revert set_exception_handler to
> old behaviour
> and take the rest in 7.1? I mean depending on size of problems it takes
It's not that safe if set_exception_handler is used as "handler of last
resort". Because then we have a whole class of exceptions
On 19/08/2015 9:17 pm, Bob Weinand wrote:
Am 19.08.2015 um 01:46 schrieb Christopher Jones :
On 12/08/2015 11:31 pm, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Christopher Jones mailto:christopher.jo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Bob,
Is the ext/phpdbg_webhelper sym link really
Hi all,
Some of us may know already. Linux Foundation CII project
https://www.coreinfrastructure.org/
released draft badge program.
https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge
We may consider badge program compliance in the future.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Trevor Suarez wrote:
> Ah, I didn't realize this thread existed. I had just commented on the old
> one, but the point still stands:
>
> PHP 7.0 RC1 was just tagged.
> Shouldn't this be a relatively high priority to fix/decide so we don't end
> up with behavior tha
11 matches
Mail list logo
