(sorry for top posting)

Hi Sara,

I think such will be just fine for RC2, unless Anatol got any object, go
ahead.

-K
On Aug 20, 2015 6:49 PM, "Sara Golemon" <poll...@php.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> A) Adding those defines prior to including stdint.h
> >> B) Expecting C++ ext devs to define those before including php.h
> >> C) Modifying zend_long.h to use things like
> >> std::numeric_limits<int64_t>() when __cplusplus is defined
> >>
> >> A may (potentially) have unexpected side-effects
> >> B has precedent (see ext/intl/config.m4)
> >> C makes the ifdef block that's already there notably more complex
> >
> > I'd rather have everything solved by php.h than having magic
> > incantations that one has to do prior to it. I would prefer A unless
> > there's really something wrong with it that. Given that these macros are
> > on their way out anyway:
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15366
> > I'm not sure it's that dangerous to define them in the meantime.
> >
> I agree! :)  Though I didn't realize they were deprecated anyway.
>
> Second question, is it too late to put it in 7.0.0?
> Happy enough to put it behind #ifdef __cplusplus to limit the exposed
> surface area.
>
> -Sara
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

Reply via email to