Re: [PHP-DEV] is GD being actively maintained?

2012-09-07 Thread Pierre Joye
hi Lester, On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > Rasmus Schultz wrote: >> >> Thank you - this confirms I'm not crazy, or at least it's evidence to >> support that theory;-) >> >> It may be OS specific - perhaps the Windows and OSX binaries are built >> against a different build (o

Re: [PHP-DEV] is GD being actively maintained?

2012-09-07 Thread Rasmus Schultz
Good point - the bug could actually be in the rendering, rather than in the bounding box calculation. We could determine which is the case, by running the exact same script with the exact same font, on a system where the bug is present, and on another system where it's not. Then overlay the resul

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why are the PHP namespaces different compared to C++?

2012-09-07 Thread Mark
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > Stas Malyshev wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >>> I wasn't assuming. I was outright making a factual statement. I never >>> made any implications of the intellectual levels of those implementing >>> the spec. I understand the RFC full well and know why the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why are the PHP namespaces different compared to C++?

2012-09-07 Thread Andrew Faulds
On 07/09/12 18:24, Mark wrote: To me this namespace in php stuff just looks like and alias. So why isn't it named as that: "alias"? I do not want to question the ones that implemented namespaces in php, but i do think that the name itself is at the very least confusing. Namespaces, like in C++, m

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why are the PHP namespaces different compared to C++?

2012-09-07 Thread Will Fitch
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Mark wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > > Stas Malyshev wrote: > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >>> I wasn't assuming. I was outright making a factual statement. I never > >>> made any implications of the intellectual levels of those implementing >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why are the PHP namespaces different compared to C++?

2012-09-07 Thread Will Fitch
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Mark wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > > Stas Malyshev wrote: > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >>> I wasn't assuming. I was outright making a factual statement. I never > >>> made any implications of the intellectual levels of those implementing >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why are the PHP namespaces different compared to C++?

2012-09-07 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! > Back on the namespace topic. I won't judge on anything, but i know > namespaces from c++. I understand that PHP isn't a compiled language > and quite frankly that doesn't matter at all. What does matter is that > PHP uses the name: "namespace" which C++ obviously had earlier. Here is someth

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why are the PHP namespaces different compared to C++?

2012-09-07 Thread Mark
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> Back on the namespace topic. I won't judge on anything, but i know >> namespaces from c++. I understand that PHP isn't a compiled language >> and quite frankly that doesn't matter at all. What does matter is that >> PHP uses the name:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: New Feature: Fully qualified class name resolution as scalar with class keyword

2012-09-07 Thread Ralph Schindler
Hey Stas, et. al., I think I've addressed some of your concerns and completed this feature/patch. https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/187 More inline ... But yes, I agree that runtime resolution only duplicates existing behavior, so it isn't really necessary (you could argue thought that