Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I see that test for bug 52062 (marked as fixed by this commit:
> http://svn.php.net/viewvc/?view=revision&revision=320481) now
> fails
> on my 32-bit system. Looking at the patch and the test, it can not
> actually succeed, as the test expects this:
> int(10
On 12/26/2011 12:40 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
I'll have a look when I get back home. Is there anything else you want me to
look at?
Yes!
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53437 =)
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
---
http://pinba.org - realtime profiling for PHP
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
Hi!
I'll have a look when I get back home.
Thanks!
Is there anything else you want me to look at?
Yes, it would be nice if you could check out XFAILs, especially the one
that crashes (53437) but others too.
Thanks in advance,
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://ww
Le 26/12/2011 09:29, Stanislav Malyshev a écrit :
> stas Mon, 26 Dec 2011 08:29:11 +
>
> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=321406
ZTS build is broken (snapshot 201112261030)
Please see trivial attached patch
Regards,
Remi.
diff -
With 321411 applied
(gdb) run -n -m
Starting program: /dev/shm/php5.4-201112261030/build-zts/sapi/cli/php -n -m
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
[PHP Modules]
bz2
calendar
Core
... ...
zlib
[Zend Modules]
Program received
hi Remi!
Thanks for the headup!
Attached patch should fix this problem but I'm not sure if we have to
do it in RINIT instead. The handler is set to NULL on dtor, so it
could be enough already to do it once in MINIT.
Cheers,
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> With 321411 appl
Le 26/12/2011 14:09, Pierre Joye a écrit :
> Attached patch should fix this problem but I'm not sure if we have to
> do it in RINIT instead. The handler is set to NULL on dtor, so it
> could be enough already to do it once in MINIT.
At least, it fix the build/run issue.
Thanks.
--
PHP Internals -
2011/12/24 Pierre Joye :
> hi Ilia,
>
> Right but there is a clear BC break here. And yes I really don't like
> how datetime deals with that but it is how it is, and it is certainly
> the only case where it fails (or almost).
>
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>> Introduc
Hi:
I have reset the vote, only vote for trunk now.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constdereference
thanks
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> post again as a top thread with this point being clarified please :)
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Laruence wrote:
>> On Tue,
hi Patrick,
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> On one side there's a clear BC break which, according to the related
> RFC, is to be considered as a blocker, on the other one, a strong and
> valid argument regarding spreading additional server variables.
> I'm not sure bein
10 matches
Mail list logo
