Em Tue, 17 May 2011 17:49:53 +0100, Stas Malyshev
escreveu:
I think we need to keep token name in the message, since it makes it
easier to understand what parser expected if you need to debug the
parser (as opposed to your code). So I think we need to have both the
human-readable name an
Hi,
are they any plans to add full namespace support for the Reflection API
in PHP 5.4. Until now there is only rudimentary
support implemented.
There would be a great benefit for userland annotation parsers, because
it could access the use statements to get the FQN
for an annotation. I think
Hi,
i recently wrote small function that allows the creation of a php-socket
by directly giving the fd#
this is very useful under linux/unix environments for Ipc.
For example:
getting forked by a webserver as fastcgi / scgi .., the webserver gives
an acceptable socket as fd#0 to the process..
Em Wed, 18 May 2011 11:44:35 +0100, Florian Wilkemeyer
escreveu:
i recently wrote small function that allows the creation of a php-socket
by directly giving the fd#
this is very useful under linux/unix environments for Ipc.
For example:
getting forked by a webserver as fastcgi / scgi .., the
Am 18.05.2011 13:13, schrieb Gustavo Lopes:
Em Wed, 18 May 2011 11:44:35 +0100, Florian Wilkemeyer
escreveu:
i recently wrote small function that allows the creation of a php-socket
by directly giving the fd#
this is very useful under linux/unix environments for Ipc.
For example:
getting for
I submitted a patch to add a curl_reset function to the cURL extension.
It would be great if this patch could find its way into the PHP 5.4
release. This is my first attempt at a patch, so a review and feedback
would be greatly appreciated.
Feature request: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=540
Hi,
I just wanted to ask what is the community's feeling on keeping the echo
shortcut. I know short tags are kind of deprecated and I think it is the
right call, however, I really really think the echo shortcut (which is still shorter than ), but
maybe this later has bigger implications that I'm
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011, dukeofgaming wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to ask what is the community's feeling on keeping the echo
> shortcut. I know short tags are kind of deprecated and I think it is the
> right call, however, I really really think the echo shortcut kept regardless of plain sho
Should this go in "Accepted" then?.
Regards,
David
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2011, dukeofgaming wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wanted to ask what is the community's feeling on keeping the echo
> > shortcut. I know short tags are kind of depre
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
> PLEASE, let the dead horse be!
>>>
>> Apparently, this horse is not as dead as some would like it to be :)
>>
>
> The horse is not dead or if so then no proper burial service was given.
> People are still waiting for the invitations and
Hi,
I'm that somebody Tyrael is talking about. FTR, I'm all for deprecating
short tags, but I do feel the echo shortcut is a separate issue. Perhaps if
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> > PLEASE, let the dead horse be!
>
> >>>
> >> Apparently, this horse is
> apparently somebody else brought up the shortag(specifically the topic again, and I've noticed that you moved the rfc from declined to "In
> discussion" recently (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortags?do=revisions), so I
> would like to know that are these rules still hold, or did something happen
On 05/18/2011 04:47 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>> apparently somebody else brought up the shortag(specifically the > topic again, and I've noticed that you moved the rfc from declined to "In
>> discussion" recently (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortags?do=revisions), so I
>> would like to know that are
Hi!
As far as I remember there weren't any serious objections to decoupling
That's what I think too, but since there was no agreement fixed on that,
I put it into discussion part.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
PHP Inte
So what would be there to discuss or agree on?, now that the topic is at
hand.
Regards,
David
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> As far as I remember there weren't any serious objections to decoupling
>> > tags in a file, and nobody else is going to come along an
Hello.
As a userland developer i'm all for it. Remove short_tags and decouple
:
> So what would be there to discuss or agree on?, now that the topic is at
> hand.
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> As far as I remember there weren't
16 matches
Mail list logo
