Team GBTX LTD wrote:
Greetings
I am trying to build a local server environment for my web development
projects (I also try to get oscommerce working) . In order to achieve this I
downloaded XAMPP but this software package appears to be still in
development, full of bugs and incompatibilities. I
Top poster!
And Windows only bugs are not critical. That error_log crash alone
should have caused an immediate release weeks ago..
--Jani
On 08/07/2009 01:06 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi Johannes,
I do not have the chance to match this planning. I'll be back from
holidays on Monday and will w
>> Does no one see the inherent issues in buying a book about a
>> not-feature-complete version of the language?
>
> I suspect in 2007/8 Larry thought that PHP6 was actually going to be
> released some time soon, rather than inventing a new roadblock with PHP5.3 -
> which is what the book now needs
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48880 is reason enough to want a
release soon - PHP 5.3 died a very fast death in production here.
--
Tom Boutell
P'unk Avenue
215 755 1330
punkave.com
window.punkave.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php
Translating and maintaining the documentation
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 28.07.2009, at 19:14, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
David Zülke wrote:
On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at
least into
HEAD. I agree to commit it
On 28.07.2009, at 19:14, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
David Zülke wrote:
On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at
least into
HEAD. I agree to commit it
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48880 is reason enough to want a
release soon - PHP 5.3 died a very fast death in production here.
for me too. this bug makes 5.3.0 unusable for me. svn is not an option for
production environment.
Thanks,
Andre
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Maili
2009/8/7 Andre Hübner
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48880 is reason enough to want a
>>> release soon - PHP 5.3 died a very fast death in production here.
>>>
>>
> for me too. this bug makes 5.3.0 unusable for me. svn is not an option for
> production environment.
>
> Thanks,
> Andre
>
>
>
Y
On 28.07.2009, at 19:14, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
David Zülke wrote:
On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at
least into
HEAD. I agree to commit it
On Aug 7, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Lewis Wright wrote:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48880 is reason enough to want a
release soon - PHP 5.3 died a very fast death in production here.
for me too. this bug makes 5.3.0 unusable for me. svn is not an
option for
production environment.
Thanks,
Andre
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
> +1 for a 5.3.1 release ASAP.
Cool down please. I was not asking to delay 5.3.1 for months but a
week or two maximum. There is always plenty of bugs to justify an
immediate release, a week or two later for the RC1 won't change
anything and w
Sure, I'm fine with that - just wanted to make sure the urgent need to
fix showstoppers was well understood. I realize there are other
considerations in play.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
>
>> +1 for a 5.3.1 release ASA
On 28.07.2009, at 19:14, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
David Zülke wrote:
On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at
least into
HEAD. I agree to commit it
14 matches
Mail list logo
