On 12.06.2008, at 16:31, Pierre Joye wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and sybase
I do not agree with.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To u
On 11.06.2008, at 01:15, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't that the last decision we made
about it the last time this was brought up? Just undocument it.
Totally. It exists, only works with strings (right?! :) and is not
recommended. So simply make it disappear from t
On Saturday 14 June 2008 15:26:20 Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> On 11.06.2008, at 01:15, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> > Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't that the last decision we made
> > about it the last time this was brought up? Just undocument it.
> > Totally. It exists, only works with strings (right
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12.06.2008, at 16:31, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> - interbase
>> - fbsql
>> - sybase and sybase_ct
>
>
> I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and sybase I do
> not agree with.
Who will maintain
On 14.06.2008, at 16:24, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12.06.2008, at 16:31, Pierre Joye wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and
sybase I do
Hi Lukas,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort to
> support them.
If it is so widely used, why noone complains about this removal? Why
there is nobody taking care of the bugs or s
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Lukas,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort to
support them.
If it is so widely used, why noone complains about this removal? Why
there is nobody taking ca
Hi Pierre,
Like I said on IRC, if the ext end up being broken, but remain in core
they can get fixed and made available easily to all users. If we move
them, then this is no longer possible. We can revist this topic for
PHP6, but I do not think we should start dropping these extension in
Hello Gregory,
Saturday, June 14, 2008, 12:16:58 AM, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> A quick note on significant improvements to phar committed recently:
> * tar-based archives now fully support metadata and signatures,
> bringing them in line with more of the features of phar-based phar archives.
> *
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and
sybase I do
not agree with.
Who will maintain them? Who can we ask when there is issues (besides
the obvious ones)?
These extension seem widely used enough t
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lukas,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort
>>> to
>>> support
Hi Lester,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apart from the problems created by changes made to the interbase driver in
> the 5.1 and early 5.2 cycle ( the 64 bit version of which STILL has not been
> repaired :( ) the driver still works fine with modern b
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> $str{} was considered a best practice for a while so as you can see via
> Google Code Search it's been used quite a bit.
> I take the blame for introducing it with the intention to not only
> create a better
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Lester,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apart from the problems created by changes made to the interbase driver in
the 5.1 and early 5.2 cycle ( the 64 bit version of which STILL has not been
repaired :( ) the driver still works fi
Lester, hi,
I even installed a
development build of PHP6 some time ago, but if there is going to be TWO
versions of PHP6 then to be honest I am not interested.
There haven't been for the last couple of weeks. We're just waiting for
Scott to finish with the Engine work so that we can commit t
Steph Fox wrote:
As far as I'm aware there's nothing in PHP 6 that can't be supported
from PHP 5.2.1 up, but there's plenty in PHP 5.3 that a lot of
developers will like.
AND SHOULD BE BEING DEVELOPED IN PHP6 SO WE CAN AT LEAST GET A CLEAN UNICODE
STABLE SYSTEM AVAILABLE TODAY !!
--
Les
Hi Lester,
Am Samstag, den 14.06.2008, 21:13 +0100 schrieb Lester Caine:
[...]
> AND SHOULD BE BEING DEVELOPED IN PHP6 SO WE CAN AT LEAST GET A CLEAN UNICODE
> STABLE SYSTEM AVAILABLE TODAY !!
Please, don't yell. KTHXBYE
cu, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter
As far as I'm aware there's nothing in PHP 6 that can't be supported from
PHP 5.2.1 up, but there's plenty in PHP 5.3 that a lot of developers will
like.
AND SHOULD BE BEING DEVELOPED IN PHP6 SO WE CAN AT LEAST GET A CLEAN
UNICODE STABLE SYSTEM AVAILABLE TODAY !!
Please don't shout, th
Pierre Joye wrote:
What I'm asking you is to help me to actually have a controllable and
testable firebird drivers in PHP. I will do my best to help you to get
things fixed and to provide the best windows binaries. However, one
thing is sure, I can't do it alone. For two reasons, I'm not a
firebi
hi Lester,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What I'm asking you is to help me to actually have a controllable and
>> testable firebird drivers in PHP. I will do my best to help you to get
>> things fixed and to provide the best windows binaries. However
On 14.06.2008, at 22:32, Lester Caine wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
What I'm asking you is to help me to actually have a controllable and
testable firebird drivers in PHP. I will do my best to help you to
get
things fixed and to provide the best windows binaries. However, one
thing is sure, I c
one of the classes documented on php.net, HttpRequestPool, is not entirely
documented correctly.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/class.httprequestpool.php
as you can see, it is documented as if the class were HttpMessage. who is
the correct person / list / w/e to contact w/ such information, so tha
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 23:16, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one of the classes documented on php.net, HttpRequestPool, is not entirely
> documented correctly.
>
> http://www.php.net/manual/en/class.httprequestpool.php
Fixed, thanks for the heads up.
>
> as you can see, it is document
On 01.06.2008, at 07:11, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
PHP 5.3 appears (to me at least) ready for release, give or take a
bit of
ironing.
I was under impression parser multibyte support wasn't yet fixed.
Was it?
Maybe we should decide if this a show stopper or not. From my
understa
2008/6/14 Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> Hi Lukas,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort
>>> to
>>> support them.
>>>
>>
>> If it is so w
>> PHP 5.3 appears (to me at least) ready for release, give or take a
>
Will PHP 5.3 be released with fileinfo or will be still me made to use
hacks to detirmine mime types?
Kevin
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
From Pierre
Playing off base. What I proposed you is to help us to get your
software continue to run smoothly with PHP, while keeping the windows
support. In the end you may even get a faster version on windows, but
I suppose you don't care about that (poor customers ;) .
This I think is part
27 matches
Mail list logo
