On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 07:43 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > Exceptions should be thrown for errors.
>
> And trying to get a method that does not exist is an error.
...which is fine, but without an elegant way of checking if that method
exists I don't think it should be
Timm Friebe wrote:
>
> I think we could all agree on
>
> bool hasMethod(string $name)
>
> (and not changing getMethod()) though, right?
Yes, although I do not think that hasMethod() is really needed.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0
I don't mind working towards this; I don't have time to implement much
in the way of the front-end, but if someone else could do that, I'll
certainly look through their patches and get it up and running on the
various machines that need it.
--Wez.
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:43:12 -0800, Andi Gutmans
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Well there have been a couple of fixes there.
I didn't quite understand the vague idea that it is stable. Do you mean
we don't know it's stable? It might not be as tested as sapi/apache but
I've seen Apache 2 handler in production use on quite a few very heavily
loaded sites.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 02:14:31AM +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
>
> "running phpBB 2.0.x with PHP5 is not supported at http://www.phpbb.com.";
Of course, that's because they're too lazy to make it work under PHP 5,
let alone be secure in the first place.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D
Adding hasMethod() sounds good to me.
Sebastian, throwing an exception is relatively slow and cumbersome and
sucks if you want to do something like a Delegation model and run through
objects and check if a method can be called. Having exceptions thrown each
time the object doesn't have the metho
At 11:50 PM 12/22/2004 +0100, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Andi could you have a look at #31118 marked critical "Two consecutive
foreach loops produce different results".
Hi Edin,
I looked into this problem. It's actually not a bug but just "weird"
behavior as a result of PHP blocks not having scope.
B
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Sure, but I mostly go by the number of open bugs on the handler and
filter sapis and how long they stay open. Even seemingly obvious ones
with a patch attached stay open for a while:
eg. http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=31055
Which has the fix with it - so could be applied
Daniel Convissor wrote:
"running phpBB 2.0.x with PHP5 is not supported at http://www.phpbb.com.";
Of course, that's because they're too lazy to make it work under PHP 5,
let alone be secure in the first place.
Of cause this has nothing to do with Apache2 issues, but phpbb like a
lot of very popu
