I don't mind working towards this; I don't have time to implement much in the way of the front-end, but if someone else could do that, I'll certainly look through their patches and get it up and running on the various machines that need it.
--Wez. On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:43:12 -0800, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know lots of people are away or busy because of the holidays. > Hopefully this topic won't be forgotten. Assuming there's agreement it'd be > great to see a couple of volunteers who could help with the technical > aspects of this. > > Andi > > At 07:06 PM 12/19/2004 -0800, Andi Gutmans wrote: > >Personally, I don't see any advantage to keeping the karma requests to > >group@ only but only disadvantages. > >I think it'd make more sense to distribute the load and have sub-groups > >that handle the different requests. For example, PEAR, Pecl, PHP docs, and > >core. > >This would make sure that we are not only much more responsive but are > >also more selective. > >Of course, this would have to be backed by a slightly smarter tool. > > > >What do you all think? > >Andi > > > >-- > >PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
