At 06:34 AM 5/7/2003 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> What you are saying is that differentiating between a null value from
> next() and not having more elements is impossible without such a function?
> (I just want to be sure I understand what your motivation is).
> I don't really have a problem wi
At 06:34 AM 5/7/2003 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> What you are saying is that differentiating between a null value from
> next() and not having more elements is impossible without such a function?
> (I just want to be sure I understand what your motivation is).
> I don't really have a problem wi
> What you are saying is that differentiating between a null value from
> next() and not having more elements is impossible without such a function?
> (I just want to be sure I understand what your motivation is).
> I don't really have a problem with array_has_more() the only problem is the
> name
At 07:00 PM 4/7/2003 +0200, Marcus Börger wrote:
Hello Andi,
damn, yeah, it was already to early in the morning when i sent the mail, i
somehow didn't notice that i was trying to send a '.tx' file :-(
What you are saying is that differentiating between a null value from
next() and not having more
Hello Andi,
damn, yeah, it was already to early in the morning when i sent the mail, i
somehow didn't notice that i was trying to send a '.tx' file :-(
Friday, July 4, 2003, 11:55:01 AM, you wrote:
AG> You forgot to attach the diff :)
AG> Andi
AG> At 03:56 AM 4/7/2003 +0200, Marcus Börger wrot
