> What you are saying is that differentiating between a null value from > next() and not having more elements is impossible without such a function? > (I just want to be sure I understand what your motivation is). > I don't really have a problem with array_has_more() the only problem is the > name is not consistent with the other methods but on the other hand we > don't allow new functions which don't follow the naming conventions. > Catch-22? :)
The key() can never become false which is why array_has_more is not needed.
Never mind, I see what you're saying. Using === false would do the trick.
Andi
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
