On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Jason Barnett wrote:
> ...
> >> The obvious problem is:
> >> What comes after "i"?
>
> ii? iii? iv?
j? k? l?
> >> How transparent is this naming scheme to the user?
>
> Well if it's a simple Roman Numeral system like what I've just done then
> we wouldn't really have an issu
Wez Furlong wrote:
ii? iii? iv?
improved improved,
improved improved improved
improved very
i means improved, not "the roman numeral i".
Not to mention the ambiguity present in:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/php/cvs/phpdoc/en/reference$ ls -d *i *v
fribidi hwapi iconv ingres-ii mysqli nsapi w32api
S
--
Wez Furlong wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 06:16:03 -0500, Jason Barnett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
The obvious problem is:
What comes after "i"?
ii? iii? iv?
improved improved,
improved improved improved
improved very
i means improved, not "the roman numeral i".
Well that may be have been the ori
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 06:16:03 -0500, Jason Barnett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> >> The obvious problem is:
> >> What comes after "i"?
>
> ii? iii? iv?
improved improved,
improved improved improved
improved very
i means improved, not "the roman numeral i".
--Wez.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Ru
...
>> The obvious problem is:
>> What comes after "i"?
ii? iii? iv?
>> How transparent is this naming scheme to the user?
Well if it's a simple Roman Numeral system like what I've just done then
we wouldn't really have an issue (except that it assumes people know
Roman Numerals). Not sure if t
xml_rpc ? :)
btw. What happened to pecl/rpc/* anyhow? :)
--Jani
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Well it's a good question but I'm not sure how we'd call it. XML-RPC is
already taken.
Ideas?
Andi
At 09:11 PM 3/21/2005 +0100, Lukas Smith wrote:
Hi,
I guess xmlprci is following
Well it's a good question but I'm not sure how we'd call it. XML-RPC is
already taken.
Ideas?
Andi
At 09:11 PM 3/21/2005 +0100, Lukas Smith wrote:
Hi,
I guess xmlprci is following the mysqli example. I am not sure if this is
a good idea to have new BC breaking versions of extensions append lette
Hi,
Lukas Smith schrieb:
Also while xmlrpci is only a pecl ext for now is seems like it registers
a class called xmlrpc ("REGISTER_XMLRPCI_CLASS(xmlrpc, rpc, NULL, 0)").
I dont think this is a good idea either.
IIRC XMLRPCi strives to be backward compatible with ext/xmlrpc...
But I agree that the
