... >> The obvious problem is: >> What comes after "i"?
ii? iii? iv? >> How transparent is this naming scheme to the user? Well if it's a simple Roman Numeral system like what I've just done then we wouldn't really have an issue (except that it assumes people know Roman Numerals). Not sure if that's really the way you all want to go though. The nice thing about doing it this way: It's a distinctly different numbering system and it just-so-happens to fit in with what we already have. Besides I thought one of the P's in PHP was "pragmatic". >> >> We had to address a similar problem in PEAR and we currently have the >> following regulation in place which is a solution which is not >> beautiful either: >> http://pear.php.net/group/docs/20031114-bbr.php Yeah that does have a few pock marks :-/ As another alternative you could just make it really, really obvious that the newest version breaks BC by just shoving BC in there. xmlrpcbc1 xmlrpcbc1.x.y xmlrpcbc2 ... -- Teach a man to fish... NEW? | http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html STFA | http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&w=2 STFM | http://php.net/manual/en/index.php STFW | http://www.google.com/search?q=php LAZY | http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=PHP&submitform=Find+search+plugins
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
