Am 06.01.2009 um 16:52 schrieb Lukas Kahwe Smith:
On 16.12.2006, at 19:50, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On 12/16/06, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to php.ini-
recommended?
I would instead change them to php.in
This sounds interesting. I'd would like to take this on.
Eric Stewart
e.stew...@mac.com
On Jan 7, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 07.01.2009, at 02:36, Mike Robinson wrote:
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I am totally against this change for 5.2. 5.3 on the otherhand
should
defin
On 07.01.2009, at 21:07, Eric Stewart wrote:
This sounds interesting. I'd would like to take this on.
Nathan was also interested.
Maybe you two can collaborate on this?
Thanks so much for stepping up!
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Develop
On 07.01.2009, at 02:36, Mike Robinson wrote:
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I am totally against this change for 5.2. 5.3 on the otherhand should
definitely make this finally happen.
Very reasonable - the best approach I would think.
so any takers?
its not going to happen unless someone does i
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> I am totally against this change for 5.2. 5.3 on the otherhand should
> definitely make this finally happen.
Very reasonable - the best approach I would think.
Best Regards
Mike Robinson
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 17:52, Marco Tabini wrote:
>
> On 6-Jan-09, at 11:49 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>
>> I'm ok with doing for 5.3, most people when upgrade rarely look at the INI
>> file especially if the update is done through a distribution's package
>> management system.
>
> Not to barge i
Marco Tabini wrote:
On 6-Jan-09, at 11:49 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
I'm ok with doing for 5.3, most people when upgrade rarely look at the
INI file especially if the update is done through a distribution's
package management system.
Not to barge in, but many people won't consider 5.2 -> 5
On 6-Jan-09, at 11:49 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
I'm ok with doing for 5.3, most people when upgrade rarely look at
the INI file especially if the update is done through a
distribution's package management system.
Not to barge in, but many people won't consider 5.2 -> 5.3 a "major"
upgr
On 6-Jan-09, at 11:26 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 06.01.2009 19:08, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
While I whole heartedly agree with the idea, I am not sure its a good
thing to do in 5.2 branch. I'd like to hear more feedback on that
topic before making the decision. The only mitigating factor is th
On 06.01.2009, at 17:26, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 17:08, Ilia Alshanetsky
wrote:
While I whole heartedly agree with the idea, I am not sure its a
good thing
to do in 5.2 branch. I'd like to hear more feedback on that topic
before
making the decision. The only mitigat
On 06.01.2009 19:08, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> While I whole heartedly agree with the idea, I am not sure its a good
> thing to do in 5.2 branch. I'd like to hear more feedback on that
> topic before making the decision. The only mitigating factor is that
> it will only affect new users since
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 17:08, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> While I whole heartedly agree with the idea, I am not sure its a good thing
> to do in 5.2 branch. I'd like to hear more feedback on that topic before
> making the decision. The only mitigating factor is that it will only affect
> new users s
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
While I whole heartedly agree with the idea, I am not sure its a good
thing to do in 5.2 branch. I'd like to hear more feedback on that topic
before making the decision. The only mitigating factor is that it will
only affect new users since upgrading the release does not
While I whole heartedly agree with the idea, I am not sure its a good
thing to do in 5.2 branch. I'd like to hear more feedback on that
topic before making the decision. The only mitigating factor is that
it will only affect new users since upgrading the release does not
modify the INI file
On 16.12.2006, at 19:50, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On 12/16/06, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to php.ini-
recommended?
I would instead change them to php.ini-development and
php.ini-production. In development
On Sat, December 16, 2006 10:54 am, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
>> Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to
>> php.ini-recommended?
>
> I would instead change them to php.ini-development and
> php.ini-production. In development you'd want to have thi
On Dec 16, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to
php.ini-recommended?
I would instead change them to php.ini-development and
php.ini-production. In development you'd want to have this stuff on..
On Dec 15, 2006, at 7:47 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to php.ini-recommended?
Time to rename php.ini-dist and a php.ini-recommended to more clearly
represent specific usage profiles, like development and production?
Perhaps the production or "reco
That's also a solution.
Either way works for me.
> -Original Message-
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 8:54 AM
> To: Andi Gutmans
> Cc: 'Ilia Alshanetsky'; 'Stanislav Malyshev'; 'PHP inter
On 12/16/06, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to php.ini-recommended?
I would instead change them to php.ini-development and
php.ini-production. In development you'd want to have this stuff on..
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to php.ini-recommended?
I would instead change them to php.ini-development and
php.ini-production. In development you'd want to have this stuff on..
regards,
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickretha
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 19:05 -0600, Richard Lynch wrote:
> On Fri, December 15, 2006 6:47 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to
> > php.ini-recommended?
>
> +1
>
> Let the developers turn it ON for a dev box.
>
> This will, however, unleash a zillion quest
On Fri, December 15, 2006 6:47 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to
> php.ini-recommended?
+1
Let the developers turn it ON for a dev box.
This will, however, unleash a zillion questions on PHP-General and in
forums...
So be it.
--
Some people have a "g
Hello,
On 12/16/06, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to php.ini-recommended?
I think so, and to "fix" what Hannes suggested earlier this week
(http://news.php.net/php.internals/26936).
--Pierre
ps: I shamelessly point you&co to my JIT/un
Time to turn it off in php.ini-dist in addition to php.ini-recommended?
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilia Alshanetsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ilia Alshanetsky
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 4:04 PM
> To: Stanislav Malyshev
> Cc: PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV]
25 matches
Mail list logo
