On Tue, November 14, 2006 4:42 am, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> The following patch adds new INI directive for CGI SAPI.
> It may enable/disable check for shebang line (#! /usr/bin/php) and as
> result
> improve performance of FastCGI.
>
> I set the default value for this directive to 1 (that means check
ts.php.net; 'Andi Gutmans'; 'Stanislav Malyshev'
> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] cgi.check_shebang_line default value
>
>
> The patch allow save one read() and one seek() syscall for
> each request. On hello.php () I
> got 430 req/sec without patch and 530 req/sec with
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 11:15 PM
> To: Dmitry Stogov
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net; Andi Gutmans; Stanislav Malyshev
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] cgi.check_shebang_line default value
>
>
> Hello
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> I think people who want the performance can disable the check, but we should
> not break BC, certainly not at a patch level release.
I agree there.
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.ph
ry Stogov'; internals@lists.php.net; 'Stanislav Malyshev'
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] cgi.check_shebang_line default value
>
> Hello Andi,
>
> all in all i would actually prefer to have no shebang
> support in cgi startin gwith 6 and stick to what we have
n
> my opinion.
> Andi
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:15 PM
>> To: Dmitry Stogov
>> Cc: internals@lists.php.net; Andi Gutmans; Stanislav Malyshev
>> Subject: Re: [PH
that's a waste in
my opinion.
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:15 PM
> To: Dmitry Stogov
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net; Andi Gutmans; Stanislav Malyshev
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] cgi.check_s
> why not use a command-line switch for itinstead an INI option?
Because FCGI can't use command-line switches in many situations. And
even if it's allowed it's usually harder to set and easier to miss.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
--
P
Hello,
On 11/14/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Stanislav,
why not use a command-line switch for itinstead an INI option?
An ini setting is perfectly valid in this case, it can/should be set
to off in 5.2.x and enabled in head. A command line options is really
a bad alter
Hello Stanislav,
why not use a command-line switch for itinstead an INI option?
best regards
marcus
Tuesday, November 14, 2006, 10:53:26 PM, you wrote:
>> i thought we were avoiding new inisettings. And also having a new INI
>> option takes some time. So is the result really faster?
> Saves
i thought we were avoiding new inisettings. And also having a new INI
option takes some time. So is the result really faster?
Saves FS access per request. New INI cost is minimal. Now, I think
avoiding INI makes most sense for INIs that change app behavior. This
INI changes almost nothing ex
Hello Dmitry,
i thought we were avoiding new inisettings. And also having a new INI
option takes some time. So is the result really faster?
best regards
marcus
Tuesday, November 14, 2006, 11:42:08 AM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> The following patch adds new INI directive for CGI SAPI.
> It may enable
I think people who want the performance can disable the check, but we
should not break BC, certainly not at a patch level release.
On 14-Nov-06, at 5:42 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
The following patch adds new INI directive for CGI SAPI.
It may enable/disable check for shebang line (#! /us
13 matches
Mail list logo
