Re: [PHP-DEV] bug tracker merging

2007-05-31 Thread Greg Beaver
Jacques Marneweck wrote: > Are you using PHPUnit for the unit tests? > > Also there was some alert stuff that Jim Winstead if I remember correctly > was wanting to hook into the mix (it's all commented out from my last > look at > the bugsweb code), which would be great to allow devs to subscribe

Re: [PHP-DEV] bug tracker merging

2007-05-31 Thread Jacques Marneweck
Are you using PHPUnit for the unit tests? Also there was some alert stuff that Jim Winstead if I remember correctly was wanting to hook into the mix (it's all commented out from my last look at the bugsweb code), which would be great to allow devs to subscribe to bugs (package / project /

Re: [PHP-DEV] bug tracker merging

2007-05-30 Thread Steph Fox
Hi David, Basically the PEAR codebase is an updated and upgrade version of the PECL codebase, shouldn't be too complicated to do Yes, but the problem is in relating either/both of them to the PHP bugtracker codebase. Thankfully we have an expert in Jani who has effectively told us to shut up

Re: [PHP-DEV] bug tracker merging

2007-05-30 Thread David Coallier
On 5/30/07, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jani, sorry didn't realize this was a public exchange. > ATM I'm focusing only in getting all the projects (pear,php,pecl) > to use same codebase for their bugtrackers in this first phase. At the risk of boring you, I'll repeat: 'Hmm I'm n

Re: [PHP-DEV] bug tracker merging

2007-05-30 Thread Steph Fox
Hi Jani, sorry didn't realize this was a public exchange. ATM I'm focusing only in getting all the projects (pear,php,pecl) to use same codebase for their bugtrackers in this first phase. At the risk of boring you, I'll repeat: 'Hmm I'm not familiar with PEAR code base, but I can apprecia

Re: [PHP-DEV] bug tracker merging

2007-05-30 Thread Jani Taskinen
ATM I'm focusing only in getting all the projects (pear,php,pecl) to use same codebase for their bugtrackers in this first phase. Solving commit merge problems through adding some magic "link to bug" thing in commits sounds so wrong to me..there's so much "fuzziness" involved. This pear bugtrack

Re: [PHP-DEV] bug tracker merging

2007-05-30 Thread Jani Taskinen
I read this email *AFTER* discussing with Gregory in IRC about current situation of having 3 separate bug trackers in *.php.net. So now I'm hijacking this coincidentally related thread for informing what happened during/after the discussion. :D Gregory Beaver kirjoitti: I'm a bit concerned b

Re: [PHP-DEV] bug tracker merging

2007-05-30 Thread Gregory Beaver
Steph Fox wrote: > Hey Greg, > >> I'm a bit concerned by the headlong rush to refactor phpbugsweb to >> include PEAR and PECL bugs. > > DON'T PANIC! There's not really a headlong rush to combine them all, > it's just Marcus brainstorming and me agreeing for the sake of the > PECL devs (especially

Re: [PHP-DEV] bug tracker merging

2007-05-30 Thread Steph Fox
Hey Greg, I'm a bit concerned by the headlong rush to refactor phpbugsweb to include PEAR and PECL bugs. DON'T PANIC! There's not really a headlong rush to combine them all, it's just Marcus brainstorming and me agreeing for the sake of the PECL devs (especially but not only those with core