Hey,
Björn Larsson wrote:
Would it then make sense to have it as compile time error in 8.0 and
make it right-associativein in e.g. 8.1?
OTOH, when looking in RFC on top 1000 affected composer packages
it looks like having the change in 8.0 might be a way forward...
r//Björn L
I think 7.4 an
On 25/07/2020 16:26, Chuck Adams wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:32 PM Rowan Tommins wrote:
If anything, I would argue for making both of these into errors, if
that's possible. I think the biggest risk with this kind of change is
not existing code relying on the old behaviour, it is code rely
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:32 PM Rowan Tommins wrote:
> If anything, I would argue for making both of these into errors, if
> that's possible. I think the biggest risk with this kind of change is
> not existing code relying on the old behaviour, it is code relying on
> the *new* behaviour which is
On 23/07/2020 13:26, Nikita Popov wrote:
PHP currently has an incorrect right-associative ternary operator. In
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ternary_associativity the use of nested ternaries
was deprecated, and was supposed to become an error in PHP 8.0.
Concurrently with that proposal
https://wiki.
> 2020年7月23日 下午8:26，Nikita Popov 写道：
>
> Hi internals,
>
> PHP currently has an incorrect right-associative ternary operator. In
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ternary_associativity the use of nested ternaries
> was deprecated, and was supposed to become an error in PHP 8.0.
>
> Concurrently with
Den 2020-07-23 kl. 17:26, skrev Sara Golemon:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 7:26 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
PHP currently has an incorrect right-associative ternary operator. In
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ternary_associativity the use of nested ternaries
was deprecated, and was supposed to become an erro
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 7:26 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> PHP currently has an incorrect right-associative ternary operator. In
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ternary_associativity the use of nested ternaries
> was deprecated, and was supposed to become an error in PHP 8.0.
>
> Concurrently with that pro
