Dmitry Stogov; internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SOAP Question re: Class Mapping & Constructors
>
>
> I would like to second this suggestion. I have been playing
> with the classmap option and could use the ability to
> manipulate the object after instan
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 10:22 PM
> To: Dmitry Stogov; internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SOAP Question re: Class Mapping & Constructors
>
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
I would like to second this suggestion. I have been playing with the
classmap option and could use the ability to manipulate the object
after instantiation but before it's returned to the user.
-adam
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Andrew Yochum wrote:
> Hi Matt & Dmitry,
>
> Calling the magic __wakeup() f
That sounds very good.
Many thanks for the assistance.
Matt.
On 12/13/05, Andrew Yochum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Matt & Dmitry,
>
> Calling the magic __wakeup() func might be appropriate in this case,
> since SOAP envelope deserialization is a lot like regular
> deserialization. It is a
Hi Matt & Dmitry,
Calling the magic __wakeup() func might be appropriate in this case,
since SOAP envelope deserialization is a lot like regular
deserialization. It is a lot less confusing than calling the
constructor w/ no args and seems quite appropriate given the context.
Andrew
On Tue, Dec
Hi Dmitry,
It is understandable that you don't know what the arguments might be.
But I would rather have the constructor called with no arguments, or
with just the std object `book` passed to the constructor instead of
no constructor at all.
Is it possible?
Thanks,
Matt.
On 12/13/05, Dmitry S
Hi Matt,
During SOAP envelope deserialization, objects are created indirectly.
So constructors are not called (constructor may need arguments).
This is not a bug.
Thanks. Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:4
