Hi Dmitry,

It is understandable that you don't know what the arguments might be.
But I would rather have the constructor called with no arguments, or
with just the std object `book` passed to the constructor instead of
no constructor at all.

Is it possible?

Thanks,
Matt.



On 12/13/05, Dmitry Stogov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> During SOAP envelope deserialization, objects are created indirectly.
> So constructors are not called (constructor may need arguments).
>
> This is not a bug.
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matt Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:49 PM
> > To: internals@lists.php.net
> > Subject: [PHP-DEV] SOAP Question re: Class Mapping & Constructors
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are using the built-in SOAP extension.
> >
> > From the docs:
> > $server = new SoapClient("books.wsdl", array('classmap' =>
> > array('book' => "MyBook")));
> >
> > Soap server will return a complex data type 'book'.  The data
> > fields for book will be mapped to the php class' data fields
> > in MyBook. It seems that the constructor for MyBook is never
> > called (according to our tests). The data fields are mapped
> > somehow internally.
> >
> > If I want MyBook to be much more than just a data container,
> > then I can foresee that I will often want/need a constructor
> > but __construct is not called.
> >
> > Could this be considered a bug? Any thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > -- Matt Friedman
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>


--
-- Matt Friedman

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to