I'm just a mere user, but if we go for other namespace separator (be it
::: or :> or anything else), then I'd rather see it used both between
namespace and class/function/constant name *and* between namespace parts.
OK, so maybe I should explain one little thing about the significance of
those
Paweł Stradomski wrote:
W liście Ryan Panning z dnia piątek 17 października 2008:
Request Autoload Gets Type
---
A::B:>C A::B:>C Class
A::B:>func() A::BNamespace
A::B:>C::CONST A::B:>C
W liście Ryan Panning z dnia piątek 17 października 2008:
> Request Autoload Gets Type
> ---
> A::B:>C A::B:>C Class
> A::B:>func() A::B Namespace
> A::B:>C::CONST A::B:>C Class
> A::B::
+1 #3
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Ryan Panning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Beaver wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceissues
>>
>> Read it and discuss. Let's be clear people: the technical problems in
>> namespaces are limited and solvable. The problems in the poli
Hi!
+1 and of course make the resolution as greg mentioned on the rfc in the
resolving access part (actually that was in stas's original original
post and I didn't realize we were still arguing over it ;)
NO, it wasn't in my proposal - my proposal was entirely different. My
proposal does not
