W liście Ryan Panning z dnia piątek 17 października 2008: > Request Autoload Gets Type > ----------------------------------------------- > A::B:>C A::B:>C Class > A::B:>func() A::B Namespace > A::B:>C::CONST A::B:>C Class > A::B::C:>D::method() A::B::C:>D Class > A::B::C::D:>CONST A::B::C::D Namespace
I'm just a mere user, but if we go for other namespace separator (be it ::: or :> or anything else), then I'd rather see it used both between namespace and class/function/constant name *and* between namespace parts. To be clear - for the examples above I'd rather have them written as: A:>B:>C A:>B:>func() A:>B:>C::CONST A:>B:>C:>D::method() or A:::B:::C, A:::B:::func, A:::B:::C::CONST. That way :: is just operator for static class access (static methods and properties), while :> or ::: is just namespace access operator, so we can always assume that anything on the left side of ::: or :> is a namespace. In Ryan's version :: is sometimes static class access operator, sometimes namespace segment separator, depending on position. -- Paweł Stradomski -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
