Hi Pierre,
Pierre Joye wrote:
However, if I have to choose something I would like to understand why
all of a sudden December 31 become a valid date. It is unrelated to 7
release date (December 3rd) and has no relevance whatsoever but easier
to remember.
This is a good observation. If we're to
Frankly, I think the LTS distros that include PHP 5.6 will be plenty — as
we've seen with 5.3, it has been maintained with back ports long after the
official EOL.
People either understand what they're getting into when making these
choices, or they don't and they don't care anyway.
I'd vote +1 on
hi,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Adam Howard wrote:
> #3 all the way. Extending support only extends the excuse of poor habits
> and encourages those habits.
Same here.
However, if I have to choose something I would like to understand why
all of a sudden December 31 become a valid date. It
#3 all the way. Extending support only extends the excuse of poor habits
and encourages those habits.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Scott Arciszewski
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > Following the initial discussion, I prepared an RFC that proposes to
> ext
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Following the initial discussion, I prepared an RFC that proposes to extend
> the support periods for PHP 5.6:
>
>
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php56timeline
>
>
>
> Thanks to Ferenc Kovacs and David Zuelke for reviewing it for any glaring
>
Zeev,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:09 PM
>> To: Zeev Suraski
>> Cc: PHP internals
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC:
> BTW, to be clear, this is really about "PHP 5 Support Timeline"
>
> (so not about a "minor" version timeline, but really about a "major"
> version one, the reason why I will +1 option #1)
That’ a very good point also raised by Ferenc in his review. I amended it
further and actually changed the
> -Original Message-
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:der...@php.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:11 PM
> To: Zeev Suraski
> Cc: PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline
>
> I think you're making the voting too complicated :
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:09 PM
> To: Zeev Suraski
> Cc: PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline
>
> Zeev,
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at
See my suggestion to split it into two separate votes ;)
> On 08.12.2015, at 17:11, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
>> Following the initial discussion, I prepared an RFC that proposes to extend
>> the support periods for PHP 5.6:
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Following the initial discussion, I prepared an RFC that proposes to extend
> the support periods for PHP 5.6:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php56timeline
>
> Thanks to Ferenc Kovacs and David Zuelke for reviewing it for any glaring
> omissions.
>
> Let
Zeev,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Following the initial discussion, I prepared an RFC that proposes to extend
> the support periods for PHP 5.6:
>
>
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php56timeline
>
>
>
> Thanks to Ferenc Kovacs and David Zuelke for reviewing it for any glar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 08/12/2015 16:14, Zeev Suraski a écrit :
> Following the initial discussion, I prepared an RFC that proposes
> to extend the support periods for PHP 5.6:
>
>
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php56timeline
Thanks for the work.
BTW, to be clear, thi
Am 08.12.2015 um 16:14 schrieb Zeev Suraski:
> I prepared an RFC that proposes to extend the support periods for PHP 5.6
Thank you for your work on this RFC, Zeev.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> -Original Message-
> From: David Zuelke [mailto:d...@heroku.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 5:19 PM
> To: Zeev Suraski
> Cc: PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline
>
> It just occurred to me (too late :D sorry Zeev) that
It just occurred to me (too late :D sorry Zeev) that it might make sense to
split this into two RFCs:
- to define the active support end date for 5.6 (e.g. "2016-08-28" or
"2016-12-02" or "2016-12-31")
- to define the security support end date for 5.6, and specify that relative to
the active su
16 matches
Mail list logo
