Zeev,

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:09 PM
>> To: Zeev Suraski
>> Cc: PHP internals
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline
>>
>> Zeev,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote:
>> > Following the initial discussion, I prepared an RFC that proposes to
>> > extend the support periods for PHP 5.6:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php56timeline
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks to Ferenc Kovacs and David Zuelke for reviewing it for any
>> > glaring omissions.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Let the discussion continue…
>>
>> I'd prefer it if the RFC took a stance and made a recommendation to one of
>> the options.
>
> It does, perhaps not in a strong enough way:
> "Further, given the 5.6 -> 7.0 upgrade is more difficult and time
> consuming - our recommendation is option #1".
>
> I shuffled things around a bit to make it clearer.  Let me know if that
> answers your concern.

Looks much better. Thank you.

I still would rather see one vote (I have a thing against multiple
vote options in general). If it gets denied, then we could do a
different RFC with a different option.

But having the stance being recommended is a good step forward.

Thanks

Anthony

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to