On Tue, October 3, 2006 6:03 pm, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> These are the sorts of things that the patch doesn't address that we
> should be talking about, not whether it would be a useful feature to
> users. We all agree it would be, but having a half-working feature
> wouldn't be.
Would it be poss
Hello,
On 10/4/06, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 3, 2006, at 9:47 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> I did check it out. Even made changes to try out a few variations on
> the theme. I also stand by that I don't like the number of variables
> it throws into the mix.
>
> How about a
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2006, at 9:47 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
>
>> How about a compromise, we finish the code migration effort first,
>> then address per-request semantics either before beta, or in the 6.1
>> branch.
>
> I am afraid that won't work. There are several extensions which n
On Oct 3, 2006, at 9:47 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
I did check it out. Even made changes to try out a few variations on
the theme. I also stand by that I don't like the number of variables
it throws into the mix.
How about a compromise, we finish the code migration effort first,
then address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What soup? Did you check out the patch?
It's actually not bad at all. It's even cleaner than what we had previously
as we just make sure we have two versions and we use the right one...
I did check it out. Even made changes to try out a few variations on
the theme. I
Christian Schneider wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Maybe in a purists view it's not great, but in real life, many many many
users run more than one application on the same PHP server. Not
supporting
per-request Unicode in PHP 6 is going to be a huge mistake and will just
screw our users, most of t
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Maybe in a purists view it's not great, but in real life, many many many
users run more than one application on the same PHP server. Not supporting
per-request Unicode in PHP 6 is going to be a huge mistake and will just
screw our users, most of them not purists nor hackers..
: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:42 AM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Per-request UG(unicode)
>
> >> No comments?
> >
> > I'm definitely +1 on the per-host configure option, if it's stable
> > enough to satisfy QA team.
> >
rom: Ilia Alshanetsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ilia Alshanetsky
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 7:23 PM
> To: Andrei Zmievski
> Cc: PHP Internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Per-request UG(unicode)
>
> After looking at the patch, I think that for the sake of code
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>
> > Nooone is arguing that from the userspace side, having per-dir support for
> > setting the unicode flag is a good thing. It is. The question is: Is it
> > good enough to justify the soup that will become of the internal registries?
>
> I'm
After looking at the patch, I think that for the sake of code sanity
we need to keep this setting only inside php.ini only.
The amount of hackery per-request setting creates is just not worth
the convenience IMHO.
-1.
Ilia
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscri
Nooone is arguing that from the userspace side, having per-dir support for
setting the unicode flag is a good thing. It is. The question is: Is it
good enough to justify the soup that will become of the internal registries?
I'm not sure there really would be a soup. Yes, there would be two
>> No comments?
>
> I'm definitely +1 on the per-host configure option, if it's stable
> enough to satisfy QA team.
>
> Making migration to unicode apps easier is definitely a big win for
> adoption.
>
Nooone is arguing that from the userspace side, having per-dir support for
setting the unicode f
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> No comments?
I didn't have the time to look & try it yet.
--
Michael
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, September 28, 2006 11:44 am, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> No comments?
I'm definitely +1 on the per-host configure option, if it's stable
enough to satisfy QA team.
Making migration to unicode apps easier is definitely a big win for
adoption.
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
No comments?
On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Andi asked me to forward this, since it didn't go through to the list
on the first try.
Hi,
The following is a patch Dmitry did to change UG(unicode) to be
configurable
per-request. The guidelines from Andrei was that it sh
16 matches
Mail list logo
