On Tue, October 3, 2006 6:03 pm, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > These are the sorts of things that the patch doesn't address that we > should be talking about, not whether it would be a useful feature to > users. We all agree it would be, but having a half-working feature > wouldn't be.
Would it be possible to better document on php.net the work-around of running a second pool of servers and proxy-forwarding or whatever the heck it is as a way to have both Unicode and non-Unicode running on one server, more or less seemlessly?... Not that I actually UNDERSTOOD that post Rasmus made to PHP-General describing how to do this, mind you, but it would at least provide a work-around for this issue -- maybe one that even large-scale webhosts could handle? Yes, I know, it's really an Apache setting, but still... It's what you need to do to get the job done. I'm just hoping to get the PHP 6 / Unicode adoption rate up to something better than glacial speeds... -- Some people have a "gift" link here. Know what I want? I want you to buy a CD from some starving artist. http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch Yeah, I get a buck. So? -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
