Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch to PHP mail() function

2005-01-10 Thread Olivier Beyssac
Paul G wrote: > while i can't speak for why noone has replied to your mail, please > search the list archives for the discussion of my equivalent patch > submission a few months back. in short, it was rejected and while i might > disagree with that (the arguments against were wrong and a derivative

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch to PHP mail() function

2005-01-08 Thread Paul G
- Original Message - From: "Olivier Beyssac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 4:57 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch to PHP mail() function > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004, Olivier Beyssac wrote: > > Please find attached a small patch to the PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch to PHP mail() function

2005-01-07 Thread Olivier Beyssac
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004, Olivier Beyssac wrote: > Please find attached a small patch to the PHP mail() function. I'm sorry but I would like to know if I did something wrong with this patch submission? Please let me know if I submitted it to a wrong address or in a wrong format. -- Olivier Beyssac

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch to PHP mail() function

2004-12-28 Thread Mikael Fern
in conjunction with this patch, i find that in ext/standard/mail.c, php_mail function doesn't check whether user supplies To in headers. so, if user uses To in first parameter and another identical To in headers, this leads into double email sending. is this the expected behaviour or some workaroun