Paul G wrote: > while i can't speak for why noone has replied to your mail, please > search the list archives for the discussion of my equivalent patch > submission a few months back. in short, it was rejected and while i might > disagree with that (the arguments against were wrong and a derivative > patch is now being used in production on a lot of shared servers running > cpanel), there appears to be no chance of having something like this > get accepted.
OK, I found your thread here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=108592532700002&r=1&w=2 Well, I have the same needs as you: we have a lot of VHosts, a lot of untrusted users, a lot of untrusted PHP scripts and our abuse team wants to be able to identify any script that generated unsollicited emails. We have ways to control network sockets usage too. And as far as I know, all my friends who are working for other hosting companies have similar restrictions. My patch only adds header if php.ini directives tell him to do so and doesn't change any default behaviour or POLA. Only my 10 cents... I don't want to start any flame-war but I wanted to say that adding those headers is a really useful feature for us too. -- Olivier Beyssac - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
