Those are very welcome news indeed. I look forward to participation
of MySQL AB folks in the PDO development.
On 24-Sep-07, at 7:31 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Pierre wrote:
Also, is it not George S, Ilia and Wez that are listed as
mainters of
PDO_MYSQL?
Yes,
On 9/24/07, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, it seems that MySQL AB is finally committing to fix up PDO_MySQL and
> to generally accept the fact that PDO is the future. Of course mysqli
> will also be actively maintained. But they will also make mysqlnd play
> nicely with PDO et
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Pierre wrote:
Also, is it not George S, Ilia and Wez that are listed as mainters of
PDO_MYSQL?
Yes, as they do all the initial work. What's the point? Mysql was not
a maintainer/initiator of any of the .net db layers (or any other
language).
I will try to discuss th
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> On 16-Sep-07, at 1:02 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
>
> > Mmm... but that means dictating which features can or can't go into
> > an extension or a specific build system purely on the level of
> > outside interest in them.
>
> Steph, isn't the goal of "cor
Pierre wrote:
Also, is it not George S, Ilia and Wez that are listed as mainters of
PDO_MYSQL?
Yes, as they do all the initial work. What's the point? Mysql was not
a maintainer/initiator of any of the .net db layers (or any other
language).
I will try to discuss this and get a commitment at
On 9/17/07, Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre skrev:
>
> > Only ext/mysql and ext/mysqli use it. PDO is somehow "planed" but I
> > have serious doubts about the motivations of mysql to ever support pdo
> > like they support other generic connectors (see .net...).
>
> The first posts on
Pierre skrev:
Only ext/mysql and ext/mysqli use it. PDO is somehow "planed" but I
have serious doubts about the motivations of mysql to ever support pdo
like they support other generic connectors (see .net...).
The first posts on the net from MySQL-people talked about mysqli first,
PDO second
David Wang wrote:
My personal opinion is that it is ready for 5.3 and should be put into
5.3. It is stable, end-users will not be affected unless they want to
use it, extension writers should not even be affected, there is no
performance degradation and it would help make PHP a much more
credibl
Hey all,
On 9/17/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So while I think making list and voting is great, I think we shouldn't
> replace good old per-case consideration and discussion with arithmetics.
> If we have clear winners and losers, it's fine, but in between we still
> need to
Hi Lester,
On 9/17/07, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ( And I'd still like to know what use the code for mysqlind is for those of us
> who will never enable mysql ? )
Only ext/mysql and ext/mysqli use it. PDO is somehow "planed" but I
have serious doubts about the motivations of mysq
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
For the most part it seems that there is a general consensus on the
features to go into PHP 5.3, my suggestion is that all features with
>10 points are to be put into the 5.3 TODO and the rest can have
another change for PHP 6 and/or PHP 5.4 (if that comes to pass).
Eit
Mmm... but that means dictating which features can or can't go into an
extension or a specific build system purely on the level of outside
interest in them.
Steph, isn't the goal of "core" to contain things that are of common use
and are not for niche uses and wouldn't lack of interest impl
Lukas has a good point about the "0" votes, however if there are niche
features most people don't really care/know about that in itself means
that there is not much support for said functionality. IMHO the point of
There's a difference. Let't take two features which got similar voting
record
"Lukas Kahwe Smith"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Stanislav Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "PHP
> Developers
> Mailing List"
> Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 5:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List (Summary)
>>
fail under your voting system but
might
pass under others. The question is whether those three are up for debate
now, or later.
- Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Stanisl
Hi Ilia,
Mmm... but that means dictating which features can or can't go into an
extension or a specific build system purely on the level of outside
interest in them.
Steph, isn't the goal of "core" to contain things that are of common use
and are not for niche uses and wouldn't lack of in
On 16-Sep-07, at 1:02 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Mmm... but that means dictating which features can or can't go into
an extension or a specific build system purely on the level of
outside interest in them.
Steph, isn't the goal of "core" to contain things that are of common
use and are not for
but might
> pass under others. The question is whether those three are up for debate
> now, or later.
> - Steph
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "St
se three are up for debate
now, or later.
- Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Stanislav Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "PHP Developers Mailing Li
On 16-Sep-07, at 11:02 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On 15-Sep-07, at 7:18 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
NP ;-) Btw the detailed breakdown of the votes is available here
http://bb.prohost.org/53Features.pdf
I have taken the data from this PDF and slightly reworked
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On 15-Sep-07, at 7:18 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
NP ;-) Btw the detailed breakdown of the votes is available here
http://bb.prohost.org/53Features.pdf
I have taken the data from this PDF and slightly reworked things [1] so
that its easy to see which topics got mo
On 15-Sep-07, at 7:18 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for organizing the things!
NP ;-) Btw the detailed breakdown of the votes is available here
http://bb.prohost.org/53Features.pdf
What we do wih "low score" ones? I think it's good to note that -1
and +1 isn't the same as tw
Hi!
Thanks for organizing the things!
What we do wih "low score" ones? I think it's good to note that -1 and
+1 isn't the same as two 0's...
Will the TODO be on http://oss.backendmedia.com/PhP53?
For the most part it seems that there is a general consensus on the
features to go into PHP 5.3,
23 matches
Mail list logo
