OK so keep me posted in the beginning of next week.
I'll also look at some of the other mentioned issues.
At 08:48 AM 4/6/2005 -0400, Wez Furlong wrote:
Hey Andi,
I've been a busy with work (and house hunting), so I've been a bit out of it.
Let me catch up and take stock on PDO again; I'd like to p
Marcus Boerger wrote:
i very much dislike that idea because a mysql3 will never be working as
expected. It can never support multiple statements at a time or transactions
or whatnot. Thus i pretty much want something that keeps me from using it
until i am pretty sure i really can live with that.
But neither can most other drivers.
Since the majority of the API is the same, what sense is there in
duplicating the code?
--Wez.
On Apr 6, 2005 10:22 AM, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Wez,
>
> i very much dislike that idea because a mysql3 will never be working as
> expec
Hello Wez,
i very much dislike that idea because a mysql3 will never be working as
expected. It can never support multiple statements at a time or transactions
or whatnot. Thus i pretty much want something that keeps me from using it
until i am pretty sure i really can live with that. A distingu
The plan is to have only one mysql driver that can be linked against
both version 3 and 4 of the client libraries.
--Wez.
On Apr 6, 2005 9:56 AM, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Wez,
>
> Wednesday, April 6, 2005, 2:48:22 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Hey Andi,
>
> > I've been a busy w
Hello Wez,
Wednesday, April 6, 2005, 2:48:22 PM, you wrote:
> Hey Andi,
> I've been a busy with work (and house hunting), so I've been a bit out of it.
> Let me catch up and take stock on PDO again; I'd like to push a PECL
> release of the various packages this weekend, before we go with Beta
>
Hey Andi,
I've been a busy with work (and house hunting), so I've been a bit out of it.
Let me catch up and take stock on PDO again; I'd like to push a PECL
release of the various packages this weekend, before we go with Beta
1.
I can't think of any show-stoppers in PDO right now, so the time to
Please send it to me.
--Wez.
On Apr 2, 2005 11:02 PM, Christopher Kings-Lynne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to roll PHP 5.1 Beta 1 very soon.
> > Wez, I've been waiting for PDO in order to get this going. Do you feel
> > it's mature enough or should I hold off some more time?
>
> Well
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I'd like to roll PHP 5.1 Beta 1 very soon.
What about the ability to declare type-hinted parameters as optional?
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69
--
PHP
I agree and that's why we made the opcode changes to make them re-entrant.
Will look into it. I was sure we already uncommented that code :)
At 08:54 PM 4/3/2005 -0400, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Can we get some things straight first (i guess that'
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Can we get some things straight first (i guess that's the idea of an alpha).
> I'd like to reintroduce __toString() since 5.1 is supposed to make it work
> again. The patching should be easy enough since we left in most of the
> necessary code as we plan
Hello Andi,
Saturday, April 2, 2005, 10:53:19 PM, you wrote:
> Hey,
> I'd like to roll PHP 5.1 Beta 1 very soon.
> Wez, I've been waiting for PDO in order to get this going. Do you feel it's
> mature enough or should I hold off some more time?
> Also, has someone already integrated PDO configure
thanks. will check it out.
At 05:16 PM 4/3/2005 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Patch attached (explanation in the bug report).
Nuno
- Original Message -
Do you have a fix?
Andi
At 03:15 PM 4/3/2005 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
But at least you could allow Solaris guys to test PHP 5.1 beta 1 :)
Nuno
-
Patch attached (explanation in the bug report).
Nuno
- Original Message -
Do you have a fix?
Andi
At 03:15 PM 4/3/2005 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
But at least you could allow Solaris guys to test PHP 5.1 beta 1 :)
Nuno
- Original Message -
Guys,
Not that I disagree with resolving the
I'll go Alpha. I'll try and roll towards the end of next week.
I agree with Ilia and Rasmus and suggest to nuke it.
Andi
At 11:48 AM 4/3/2005 -0400, Sean Coates wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I'd like to roll PHP 5.1 Beta 1 very soon.
Wez, I've been waiting for PDO in order to get this going. Do you fe
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I'd like to roll PHP 5.1 Beta 1 very soon.
Wez, I've been waiting for PDO in order to get this going. Do you feel
it's mature enough or should I hold off some more time?
Before we go beta, I'd like to see php_check_syntax() disappear (as it
seems it will never be "fixed").
It
I'm fine with calling it Alpha especially as PDO might still change stuff.
At 10:05 AM 4/3/2005 -0400, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Jani,
>
> We're talking beta (I don't mind calling it alpha either) to get PDO
and the
> new engine architecture tested by more peo
Do you have a fix?
Andi
At 03:15 PM 4/3/2005 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
But at least you could allow Solaris guys to test PHP 5.1 beta 1 :)
Nuno
- Original Message -
Guys,
Not that I disagree with resolving these problems, but it has nothing to
do with beta 1 which was planned to get wider t
Hello Jani,
yes that'd much better then calling it beta. Beta would prevent us from
changes and according to my history there are several things just missing
right now.
Sunday, April 3, 2005, 9:32:49 AM, you wrote:
> Then call it pre-alpha.
> --Jani
>> We're talking beta (I don't
But at least you could allow Solaris guys to test PHP 5.1 beta 1 :)
Nuno
- Original Message -
Guys,
Not that I disagree with resolving these problems, but it has nothing to
do with beta 1 which was planned to get wider testing and feedback, mainly
about PDO which is the main new code bas
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Jani,
>
> We're talking beta (I don't mind calling it alpha either) to get PDO and the
> new engine architecture tested by more people.
I think we should call it alpha too...
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xde
Then call it pre-alpha.
--Jani
We're talking beta (I don't mind calling it alpha either) to get PDO and the
new engine architecture tested by more people.
It doesn't mean all tests need to pass. Don't worry, bugs will be addressed
before a 5.1 release which is still very far off. But don'
Guys,
Not that I disagree with resolving these problems, but it has nothing to do
with beta 1 which was planned to get wider testing and feedback, mainly
about PDO which is the main new code base in 5.1.
It won't wait for any of these things although I'll be happy if people
resolve them :)
Andi
Jani,
We're talking beta (I don't mind calling it alpha either) to get PDO and
the new engine architecture tested by more people.
It doesn't mean all tests need to pass. Don't worry, bugs will be addressed
before a 5.1 release which is still very far off. But don't expect the
whole bugs.php.net
Maybe we should first get all the tests pass before rolling
any kind of release? Here's the list of currently failing tests:
(note: some might not be bugs but just bad tests..)
ZE2 ArrayAccess::offsetGet ambiguties [tests/classes/array_access_003.phpt]
ZE2 ArrayAccess and sub Ar
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 03:00:03PM -0700, Robert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >I would like first to see some bugs closed, like:
> >* #30641 - PHP 5.1 doesn't compile on Solaris 9
> >* #31725 - PHP is always segfaulting when using sqlite
> >* upgrade sqlite and PCRE libraries
>
> Maybe also upgrade GD.
>
>
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:48:59 +0100
"Nuno Lopes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like first to see some bugs closed, like:
> * #30641 - PHP 5.1 doesn't compile on Solaris 9
> * #31725 - PHP is always segfaulting when using sqlite
> * upgrade sqlite and PCRE libraries
There are also some bugs
Hi,
I would like first to see some bugs closed, like:
* #30641 - PHP 5.1 doesn't compile on Solaris 9
* #31725 - PHP is always segfaulting when using sqlite
* upgrade sqlite and PCRE libraries
Maybe also upgrade GD.
Also, can I humbly suggest we add the Progress Meter / Upload Status
Patch for ve
I would like first to see some bugs closed, like:
* #30641 - PHP 5.1 doesn't compile on Solaris 9
* #31725 - PHP is always segfaulting when using sqlite
* upgrade sqlite and PCRE libraries
Thanks,
Nuno
- Original Message -
Hey,
I'd like to roll PHP 5.1 Beta 1 very soon.
Wez, I've been wait
Well if someone can help me get sqlstate working in pdo_pgsql I'd be
happy with a release. At the moment it's just silly that it's not done.
However, I'm finding the PDO code a bit of a nightmare so I cannot
propagate the sqlstates in all cases...
Maybe could I send someone my patch so far?
A
I'd like to roll PHP 5.1 Beta 1 very soon.
Wez, I've been waiting for PDO in order to get this going. Do you feel
it's mature enough or should I hold off some more time?
Well if someone can help me get sqlstate working in pdo_pgsql I'd be
happy with a release. At the moment it's just silly that
31 matches
Mail list logo
