Like case-sensitivity.
-Andrei
P.S. Joking, I am _just_ JOKING! Have a sense of humor, people.
On Mar 12, 2006, at 8:50 AM, Pierre wrote:
On 3/12/06, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lukas, that's extremely odd. Check history! (when most of the
core team
agreed on jump originally, fo
Seems the majority prefers "goto".
I'll change "jump" to "goto" tomorrow in case of no serious objections.
Thanks. Dmitry.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello bertrand,
just to clearify this, we don't do voting here becuase it is impossible to
bring a majority of php users here or decide who is important and so on.
Thus we are only doing surveys here even if called voting. And i assume that
all people on this list have better things to do than i
Let's just call it goto and be done with it. It seems that for the
people who will use this feature "goto" name will cause the least amount
of "WTF".
Ilia
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Can't you g(irl|uy)s install somewhere a right pool so people can simply
vote ?
With some identification, so you can sort out common people, registered,
core, etc... results ?
I mean for simple choices e.g. goto|jump|both,
otherwise, as was recently proposed, RFC are certainly nice and more
ef
Lukas, that's extremely odd. Check history! (when most of the core team
agreed on jump originally, for a start). I've seen five very vocal pro
'goto's here and NO good reasons given for it. There are several good
reasons against.
The result of the vote in this thread is clear. No matter what
t;> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 1:22 AM
>> To: Wez Furlong
>> Cc: Dmitry Stogov; internals@lists.php.net
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion)
>>
>>
>> Hello Wez,
>>
&
On 3/12/06, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lukas, that's extremely odd. Check history! (when most of the core team
> agreed on jump originally, for a start). I've seen five very vocal pro
> 'goto's here and NO good reasons given for it. There are several good
> reasons against.
The res
Dmitry, maybe I have overlooked a single post, but I have yet to see a
single post favoring "jump" over "goto". The common decision is here and
it is "goto".
Lukas, that's extremely odd. Check history! (when most of the core team
agreed on jump originally, for a start). I've seen five very
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
We already have exceptions, so we don't need another longjump :)
"jump" or "goto"? Just make common decision and I will change it.
Dmitry, maybe I have overlooked a single post, but I have yet to see a
single post favoring "jump" over "goto". The common decision is here a
arch 11, 2006 1:22 AM
>> To: Wez Furlong
>> Cc: Dmitry Stogov; internals@lists.php.net
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion)
>>
>>
>> Hello Wez,
>>
>>just to continue on this nice argument: Jump reminds me of
>> t
006 1:22 AM
> To: Wez Furlong
> Cc: Dmitry Stogov; internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion)
>
>
> Hello Wez,
>
>just to continue on this nice argument: Jump reminds me of
> the worst addition to c ever: longjump.
>
> m
Hello Wez,
just to continue on this nice argument: Jump reminds me of the worst
addition to c ever: longjump.
marcus
Friday, March 10, 2006, 2:36:56 PM, you wrote:
> My vote is +1 for goto, just because that largely describes what it
> does and how it is used. I don't mind if it winds up be
+1 for goto
-1 for jump
Wez Furlong wrote:
My vote is +1 for goto, just because that largely describes what it
does and how it is used. I don't mind if it winds up being called
jump, I just think it will be easier for people to find it when they
need it if it is called 'goto'. 'goto' also c
My vote is +1 for goto, just because that largely describes what it
does and how it is used. I don't mind if it winds up being called
jump, I just think it will be easier for people to find it when they
need it if it is called 'goto'. 'goto' also comes with all the usual
anti-goto propaganda that
At 10:03 09/03/2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>>The last question:
>>What do you thin about Andi's solution about using "jump" instead of
"goto"?
Great! Yet another keyword. PHP keeps surprising the world...
>>It may make sense, because it is not a full analog of C's goto
statement. It
>>is a lim
jump makes more sense than goto. We bounced it off in the Paris
meeting, IIRC it was fairly popular in case we go down the route of
this semantics.
Zeev
At 10:03 09/03/2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
The solution (2) - "goto only" is the winner.
So in case of no serious objections, I'll comm
Jon Dowland wrote:
At 1141902889, Andrey Hristov wrote:
sorry for sending second email. Another choice could be `leave`, which
seems better than `escape` (clashes with escaping sequences).
I think `leave` has too many connotations with `break` and similar
commands, and could be misleading.
At 1141895342, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> > The last question: What do you thin about Andi's solution about
> > using "jump" instead of "goto"?
>
> I don't really mind... but I wonder why you want to do this? Both work
> equally well and most people are fami
At 1141902889, Andrey Hristov wrote:
> sorry for sending second email. Another choice could be `leave`, which
> seems better than `escape` (clashes with escaping sequences).
I think `leave` has too many connotations with `break` and similar
commands, and could be misleading.
--
Jon Dowland
http:
about `escape`?
Thanks. Dmitry.
-Original Message-
From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March
09, 2006 11:09 AM
To: Dmitry Stogov
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion)
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote
: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion)
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
The solution (2) - "goto only" is the winner.
So in case of no serious objections, I'll commit the
"goto.diff" patch
in 24 hour.
I am indifferent - "goto" or "jump", but may be others don't.
Thanks. Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:09 AM
> To: Dmitry Stogov
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
&g
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The solution (2) - "goto only" is the winner.
> So in case of no serious objections, I'll commit the "goto.diff" patch in 24
> hour.
>
> The last question:
> What do you thin about Andi's solution about using "jump" instead of "goto"?
I don't
24 matches
Mail list logo
