My vote is +1 for goto, just because that largely describes what it does and how it is used. I don't mind if it winds up being called jump, I just think it will be easier for people to find it when they need it if it is called 'goto'. 'goto' also comes with all the usual anti-goto propaganda that will help discourage people that shouldn't be using it from using it.
--Wez. On 3/9/06, Dmitry Stogov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The solution (2) - "goto only" is the winner. > So in case of no serious objections, I'll commit the "goto.diff" patch in 24 > hour. > > The last question: > What do you thin about Andi's solution about using "jump" instead of "goto"? > > It may make sense, because it is not a full analog of C's goto statement. It > is a limited "goto". It allows jump back and forward, but not INTO loops and > switch statements. > > Thanks. Dmitry. > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
