On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:21 AM Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:18 AM Nikita Popov
> wrote:
> > Very much opposed to any kind of special handling for is_resource(). We
> > used to do this for is_object() and __PHP_Incomplete_Class and I'm very
> > happy to be rid of this specia
On 12.02.2019 at 17:04, Rowan Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 15:30, Bishop Bettini wrote:
>
>> +1 for movement away from resources, generally.
>>
>> Resources represent connections to external resources, in a manner that's
>> opaque to userland [1]. Would it make sense to update is_reso
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:18 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Very much opposed to any kind of special handling for is_resource(). We
> used to do this for is_object() and __PHP_Incomplete_Class and I'm very
> happy to be rid of this special behavior. Let's not add is back in a new
> place.
>
Agreed. Thi
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:30 PM Bishop Bettini wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:00 AM Nikita Popov
> wrote:
>
>> The ext/xml extension currently has GC issues, see
>> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=76874. The tl;dr is that uses of
>> xml_parser
>> will usually result in a cyclic structure, b
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:04 AM Rowan Collins
wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 15:30, Bishop Bettini wrote:
>
> > +1 for movement away from resources, generally.
> >
> > Resources represent connections to external resources, in a manner that's
> > opaque to userland [1]. Would it make sense to u
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 15:30, Bishop Bettini wrote:
> +1 for movement away from resources, generally.
>
> Resources represent connections to external resources, in a manner that's
> opaque to userland [1]. Would it make sense to update is_resource (and
> friends) to be aware that "resources" retu
Johannes Schlüter schrieb am Di. 12. Feb. 2019 um
16:57:
> On Di, 2019-02-12 at 10:29 -0500, Bishop Bettini wrote:
> > Would it make sense to update is_resource
> > (and friends) to be aware that "resources" returned from xml_parser_*
> > are not resources proper, but rather resources nominal?
>
On Di, 2019-02-12 at 10:29 -0500, Bishop Bettini wrote:
> Would it make sense to update is_resource
> (and friends) to be aware that "resources" returned from xml_parser_*
> are not resources proper, but rather resources nominal?
>
> If userland needed to strictly determine what was a resource pro
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:00 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> The ext/xml extension currently has GC issues, see
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=76874. The tl;dr is that uses of
> xml_parser
> will usually result in a cyclic structure, but resources do not support
> cycle GC. This means that the user
