Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7

2015-01-07 Thread Pascal Martin, AFUP
On 07/01/2015 01:44, Andrea Faulds wrote: The voting widget and RFC can be found here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php57 Hi, We've discussed this RFC with other members of AFUP and while opinions have been expressed for both "yes" and "no", it seems we are at about 2/3 of "yes" -- which means

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7

2015-01-06 Thread Andrea Faulds
Good evening, > On 29 Dec 2014, at 14:41, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > I’m going to put the PHP 5.7 RFC to a vote, since it’d been 2 weeks. I’m not > entirely certain myself whether it’s a good idea, but I’d like it for us to > vote on it so we can settle the matter. If people vote against 5.7, a

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7

2014-12-30 Thread Andrea Faulds
Hi Andi, > On 30 Dec 2014, at 21:43, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > My take is that anything that takes away efforts from getting PHP 7 to market > faster is a distraction. > PHP.net needs to continue to show leadership in evolving the runtime. We have > a pretty great jewel in our hands. Some very g

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7

2014-12-30 Thread Andi Gutmans
> On Dec 30, 2014, at 12:26 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > Hi! > >> I’m going to put the PHP 5.7 RFC to a vote, since it’d been 2 weeks. >> I’m not entirely certain myself whether it’s a good idea, but I’d >> like it for us to vote on it so we can settle the matter. If people >> vote against

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7

2014-12-30 Thread Andrea Faulds
Hey Leon, > On 30 Dec 2014, at 19:14, Leon Sorokin wrote: > > Would the unassociation or deprecation-for-unassociation of the ternary '?' > (discussed in another thread [1]) be appropriate for the 5.7? Kris Craig > mentioned he would write up an RFC for this when he has a chance. I don’t thin

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7

2014-12-30 Thread Andrea Faulds
Hey Stas, > On 30 Dec 2014, at 08:26, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > I still haven't achieved a proper understanding of what 5.7 would > actually include (so far the only real BC thing mentioned that it can > warn about is the switch thing, and IMHO making the new minor just > because of that ma

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7

2014-12-30 Thread Leon Sorokin
On 12/30/2014 2:26 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: I still haven't achieved a proper understanding of what 5.7 would actually include (so far the only real BC thing mentioned that it can warn about is the switch thing, and IMHO making the new minor just because of that makes little sense, of cours

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7

2014-12-30 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! > I’m going to put the PHP 5.7 RFC to a vote, since it’d been 2 weeks. > I’m not entirely certain myself whether it’s a good idea, but I’d > like it for us to vote on it so we can settle the matter. If people > vote against 5.7, a new RFC proposing an alternative could always be > made by some

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7

2014-12-29 Thread Andrea Faulds
Hey Ferenc, > On 29 Dec 2014, at 15:43, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > I'm not entirely sure that it is a good idea to go through the voting, as in > a previous mail you wrote that you don't support the idea anymore and you > plan withdrawing it: > https://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.ne

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] PHP 5.7

2014-12-29 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote: > Good afternoon, > > I’m going to put the PHP 5.7 RFC to a vote, since it’d been 2 weeks. I’m > not entirely certain myself whether it’s a good idea, but I’d like it for > us to vote on it so we can settle the matter. If people vote against 5