> On Dec 30, 2014, at 12:26 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > >> I’m going to put the PHP 5.7 RFC to a vote, since it’d been 2 weeks. >> I’m not entirely certain myself whether it’s a good idea, but I’d >> like it for us to vote on it so we can settle the matter. If people >> vote against 5.7, a new RFC proposing an alternative could always be >> made by someone. > > I still haven't achieved a proper understanding of what 5.7 would > actually include (so far the only real BC thing mentioned that it can > warn about is the switch thing, and IMHO making the new minor just > because of that makes little sense, of course I'm not counting > non-accepted RFCs since otherwise there's like 40 of them), so I intend > to vote no, but if somebody really sees something substantial that I > missed, please point me out, as I am not opposed to the idea of 5.7 just > don't see any practical content for it for now.
My take is that anything that takes away efforts from getting PHP 7 to market faster is a distraction. PHP.net needs to continue to show leadership in evolving the runtime. We have a pretty great jewel in our hands. Some very good RFCs that are going to make it in. Postponing PHP 7 (which this would as we have a finite amount of resources on this list) would not be good for our users. Andi P.S. - Not interested in debating it. Definitely accept folks can have other views. Just wanted to state my opinion clearly :) -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
