Le mer. 10 juin 2015 à 17:20, Peter Cowburn a
écrit :
> On 28 April 2015 at 14:24, Olivier Garcia wrote:
>
> > Dear Internals,
> >
> > The "Improved Error Callback Mechanism" RFC is now in voting phase.
> >
> > You can cast your vote on the Wiki [1] and the according patch is
> > available as a
On 28 April 2015 at 14:24, Olivier Garcia wrote:
> Dear Internals,
>
> The "Improved Error Callback Mechanism" RFC is now in voting phase.
>
> You can cast your vote on the Wiki [1] and the according patch is
> available as a Pull Request [2].
>
> Vote will be open for two weeks, counting from to
Le jeu. 30 avr. 2015 à 02:26, Stanislav Malyshev a
écrit :
> Hi!
>
> > You can cast your vote on the Wiki [1] and the according patch is
> > available as a Pull Request [2].
> >
> > Vote will be open for two weeks, counting from today.
> >
>
> I think the idea of this RFC is nice but it needs a b
Le jeu. 30 avr. 2015 à 01:32, Stanislav Malyshev a
écrit :
> Hi!
>
> > The issue targeted here is "two extensions overriding php_error_cb can't
> > live side by side" and that issue exists since PHP 4.0. Should a bug
> report
> > be opened?
>
> I'm not sure why can't they live side by side.
Sin
Hi!
> we asked for feedbacks on the matter [1] [2], stating from the very
> beginning that, to our understanding, it wasn't a feature but code
> gardening.
I think introducing new engine APIs, to be used by extensions, is not
something that should be taken lightly as mere refactoring. If the
exte
Hi!
> You can cast your vote on the Wiki [1] and the according patch is
> available as a Pull Request [2].
>
> Vote will be open for two weeks, counting from today.
>
I think the idea of this RFC is nice but it needs a bit more work to
make it really good and successful. See some of the notes b
Hi!
> The issue targeted here is "two extensions overriding php_error_cb can't
> live side by side" and that issue exists since PHP 4.0. Should a bug report
> be opened?
I'm not sure why can't they live side by side. Of course, if the
override is made in incompatible manner, they can't, but the s
ALLAERT; Olivier Garcia; PHP
> > Internals;
> > Kalle Sommer Nielsen
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Improved Error Callback Mechanism
> >
> > Zeev, as the author of the php7timeline, what do you think about merging
> > this one?
>
> I think it'
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 2:54 PM
> To: franc...@php.net; Zeev Suraski
> Cc: Pierre Joye; Adam Harvey; Patrick ALLAERT; Olivier Garcia; PHP
> Internals;
> Kalle Sommer Nielsen
> Subject:
> De : Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com]
>
> For PHP7 we had a previously voted on and accepted timeline
> (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php7timeline) which stated marc 15 as
> the last time for RFCs targetting php7, and as far as I can tell, everybody
> seemed to agree that any RFC targettin
Le mer. 29 avr. 2015 à 10:57, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a écrit :
> I would love to see more work toward identifying issues in PHP7, and
> hopefully we can get that once we release the first alpha.
>
The issue targeted here is "two extensions overriding php_error_cb can't
live side by side" and that
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:24 PM, François Laupretre
wrote:
> > De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
> >
> > I would suggest then to end the white card given with the php7 rfc
>
> +1 on this. How can we make it official ? How can we stop the changes
> merged to the PHP 7 branch every da
> De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
>
> I would suggest then to end the white card given with the php7 rfc
+1 on this. How can we make it official ? How can we stop the changes merged to
the PHP 7 branch every day ? Start a 7.1 branch ?
François
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime D
Le mer. 29 avr. 2015 à 03:19, Pierre Joye a écrit :
> On Apr 29, 2015 5:38 AM, "Adam Harvey" wrote:
> >
> > On 28 April 2015 at 15:10, Patrick ALLAERT
> wrote:
> > > Le mar. 28 avr. 2015 à 20:42, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a
> écrit :
> > >
> > >> I should probably have been faster at replying, but
Hi Patrick
2015-04-29 0:10 GMT+02:00 Patrick ALLAERT :
> "No go"? Isn't that a bit rough?
Well we need to be fair and hold our own policies/processes we agree
to true, else there is no point in having them.
>
> That kind of change normally doesn't require an RFC at all. We did one for
> document
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Adam Harvey wrote:
> So, please, show respect for the people working hard on PHP 7.0 [...]
Whoa, the "show respect for the people that work" card already ?
Let's all chill. Here are some kitteh.
http://lol.cat/3z
> by not trying to push something in against our
On Apr 29, 2015 5:38 AM, "Adam Harvey" wrote:
>
> On 28 April 2015 at 15:10, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> > Le mar. 28 avr. 2015 à 20:42, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a
écrit :
> >
> >> I should probably have been faster at replying, but for PHP7 this is a
> >> no-go. I realize this is a pure internal chang
On 28 April 2015 at 15:10, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> Le mar. 28 avr. 2015 à 20:42, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a écrit :
>
>> I should probably have been faster at replying, but for PHP7 this is a
>> no-go. I realize this is a pure internal change and have nothing to do
>> with userland, but as currently
Le mar. 28 avr. 2015 à 20:42, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a écrit :
> I should probably have been faster at replying, but for PHP7 this is a
> no-go. I realize this is a pure internal change and have nothing to do
> with userland, but as currently is, we are in feature freeze and it
> creates a bad prec
Hi Dennis,
Le mar. 28 avr. 2015 à 18:33, Dennis Birkholz a
écrit :
>
> just to satisfy my personal curiosity: how can this RFC target 7.0 which
> had the feature freeze over a month ago? Should it not be 7.1 just to
> treat all contributors equal?
>
We are fully aware of the feature freeze and h
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> I should probably have been faster at replying, but for PHP7 this is a
> no-go. I realize this is a pure internal change and have nothing to do
> with userland, but as currently is, we are in feature freeze and it
> creates a bad prece
Hi Olivier
2015-04-28 15:24 GMT+02:00 Olivier Garcia :
> Dear Internals,
>
> The "Improved Error Callback Mechanism" RFC is now in voting phase.
I should probably have been faster at replying, but for PHP7 this is a
no-go. I realize this is a pure internal change and have nothing to do
with userl
Hi all,
Am 28.04.2015 um 15:24 schrieb Olivier Garcia:
> The "Improved Error Callback Mechanism" RFC is now in voting phase.
just to satisfy my personal curiosity: how can this RFC target 7.0 which
had the feature freeze over a month ago? Should it not be 7.1 just to
treat all contributors equal?
23 matches
Mail list logo
