Hi! > we asked for feedbacks on the matter [1] [2], stating from the very > beginning that, to our understanding, it wasn't a feature but code > gardening.
I think introducing new engine APIs, to be used by extensions, is not something that should be taken lightly as mere refactoring. If the externally visible APIs stayed the same, fine, but it's not exactly the case here. > We *only* got good ones during the discussion phase, hence the change of > status. I personally missed the original announce in March and had extremely busy week last week, so I could only take a look at it this week. Yes, I understand it is frustrating that people take a lot of time to review things, but APIs are things that tend to stick, so it's best not to rush them I think. -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
