Hey Tom,
"Thomas Punt" a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion
Hey Benoit,
From: bensor...@neuf.fr
Hi,
I agree, this behaviour should be extended to all the is_* functions if
possible.
I'm not sure we can do that for all of the is_* functions, since
is_callable() accepts up to
Hey Benoit,
> From: bensor...@neuf.fr
> Hi,
>
> I agree, this behaviour should be extended to all the is_* functions if
> possible.
>
I'm not sure we can do that for all of the is_* functions, since is_callable()
accepts up to three arguments rather than taking only a single argument like
t
Hi,
""Sebastian B.-Hagensen"" a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion :
caojcv8yx7vohtd1ja2obdrntdzb0q1soyqdyhsar3vt2vgs...@mail.gmail.com...
2015-02-13 14:45 GMT+01:00 Thomas Punt :
Hi Francois,
From: franc...@tekwire.net>
May I suggest to extend your proposal to is_null() with t
Hi,
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:09:16 +0100
> From: sbj.ml.r...@gmail.com
>
> While I don't know how common such a usage is I'm certain that there
> is a use case for it. However, just modifying a subset of the is_*
> functions sounds like a bad idea. If such a change is applied it
> should be do
Hi,
2015-02-13 14:45 GMT+01:00 Thomas Punt :
> Hi Francois,
>
>> From: franc...@tekwire.net>
>> May I suggest to extend your proposal to is_null() with the same logic ?
> If we were to do the same with is_null(), then would it not be best to do it
> with all the is_*() functions? I would be more
Hi Francois,
> From: franc...@tekwire.net>
> May I suggest to extend your proposal to is_null() with the same logic ?
If we were to do the same with is_null(), then would it not be best to do it
with all the is_*() functions? I would be more than happy to cater for those
functions as well, thoug
> De : Michael Wallner [mailto:mike.php@gmail.com] De la part de Michael
Wallner
>
> > I think the || behaviour is the most useful, as its the analogue of
> > issets. So !empty($a, $b, $c) would work similarly to isset($a, $b,
> > $c), and similarly, !isset($a, $b, $c) would work similarly to
On 13/02/15 12:31, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
>> On 13 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>>> On 13 Feb 2015, at 07:28, Michael Wallner wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/02/15 19:55, Thomas Punt wrote:
>>>
I'd like to propose to make empty() a variadic, where if any
arguments p
Hi Reeze,
> From: re...@php.net
>
> For example: echo $a, $b, $c, & empty($a, $b, $c), they are treated equal,
>
> if the empty() means if any one of them is empty then result is TRUE, the
> advantage of it disappeared:
>
> if (empty($a, $b, $c)) {
> // you might want to check it again.
> if (e
Hi,
> From: a...@ajf.me>
> * I assume Thomas actually meant “where if any arguments passed in are
> considered empty, then *true* is returned”, i.e. (empty($a) || empty($b) ||
> empty($c))
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
>
> I think the || behaviour is the most useful, as it’s the analogue of iss
Hi,
On 13 February 2015 at 19:31, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> > On 13 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> >> On 13 Feb 2015, at 07:28, Michael Wallner wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/02/15 19:55, Thomas Punt wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'd like to propose to make empty() a variadic, where if
> On 13 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
>> On 13 Feb 2015, at 07:28, Michael Wallner wrote:
>>
>> On 12/02/15 19:55, Thomas Punt wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to propose to make empty() a variadic, where if any
>>> arguments passed in are considered empty, then false is returned
Hey,
> On 13 Feb 2015, at 07:28, Michael Wallner wrote:
>
> On 12/02/15 19:55, Thomas Punt wrote:
>
>> I'd like to propose to make empty() a variadic, where if any
>> arguments passed in are considered empty, then false is returned
>
> Should that read "if any arguments passed in are considere
On 12/02/15 19:55, Thomas Punt wrote:
> I'd like to propose to make empty() a variadic, where if any
> arguments passed in are considered empty, then false is returned
Should that read "if any arguments passed in are considered *NOT* empty,
then false is returned"?
--
Regards,
Mike
--
PHP In
Hi Kris,
> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:21:40 -0800
> From: kris.cr...@gmail.com
> To: tp...@hotmail.co.uk
> CC: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [DISCUSSION] Make empty() a Variadic
>
> I'd say go ahead and draft an RFC with all the details of your prop
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Thomas Punt wrote:
> Hello PHP Internals!
> I'd like to propose to make empty() a variadic, where if any arguments
> passed in are considered empty, then false is returned - otherwise return
> true.
> My reasoning for wanting this feature is as follows:1)It's a c
16 matches
Mail list logo
