>
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing to inform, that the current Windows infrastructure hosting
> sponsor doesn't plan to support the project anymore. Furthermore, a
> notification was given, that the servers will be taken down within a couple
> of next weeks. Alex Schoenmaker found another sponsor, so all the
Hi,
I'm writing to inform, that the current Windows infrastructure hosting
sponsor doesn't plan to support the project anymore. Furthermore, a
notification was given, that the servers will be taken down within a couple
of next weeks. Alex Schoenmaker found another sponsor, so all the HW will
have
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>
>> So I'd go for fixing what is broken and not fixing what isn't :)
>
> Right, I am on it. Snaps page works now except for master. I will
> finish that this week.
>
> As of the announceme
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> So I'd go for fixing what is broken and not fixing what isn't :)
Right, I am on it. Snaps page works now except for master. I will
finish that this week.
As of the announcements, yes, we really want to post windows specific
news too, libs
Hi!
> there has been some chatter about windows.php.net, which drives me to
> the question: Do we need that site? Why and for what?
Since windows support in PHP is a bit different from Unix systems -
unlike all other systems, we provide official binaries - I think having
separate domain for it is
Lester Caine in php.internals (Sun, 01 Sep 2013 14:01:22 +0100):
>Which perhaps why http://www.apachelounge.com/viewforum.php?f=6 has proven
>popular. It would be interesting to know how many download from there rather
>than the 'official' site?
I really would not know. It is a free dropbox-acco
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Let be more constructive.
We are discussing to make PHP better, aren't we?
Which perhaps why http://www.apachelounge.com/viewforum.php?f=6 has proven
popular. It would be interesting to know how many download from there rather
than the 'official' site?
http://www.anindya
Hi,
On Sep 1, 2013 11:24 AM, "Florian Anderiasch" wrote:
>
> On 01.09.2013 03:01, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
> >> Also I don't consider the separation userfriendly. A user comes to
> >> php.net and tries to fetch downloads ... that might be streamlined
quite
> >> a bit when properly grouped together.
>
On 01.09.2013 03:01, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> Also I don't consider the separation userfriendly. A user comes to
>> php.net and tries to fetch downloads ... that might be streamlined quite
>> a bit when properly grouped together.
>
> Many can, could, should or would. Complaining and doing almost not
Guys,
Let be more constructive.
We are discussing to make PHP better, aren't we?
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
lol.
(sorry for top posting)
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 03:01 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Johannes Schlüter
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 01:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> >> > Why and for what?
> >> >
> >> > Few data items:
> >> > * The "news" on w.p.n are
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 01:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> > Why and for what?
>> >
>> > Few data items:
>> > * The "news" on w.p.n are not really maintained and provide
>> > outdated info.
>>
>> I take the blame for that. We h
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> > I could be convinced that we need a dedicated site/subdomain for our
> > windows users, but I think that it should be conform our existing
> standards:
> >
> >- the production co
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 01:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> > Why and for what?
> >
> > Few data items:
> > * The "news" on w.p.n are not really maintained and provide
> > outdated info.
>
> I take the blame for that. We have been too busy with (many) other
> (also non windows specific)
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> I could be convinced that we need a dedicated site/subdomain for our
> windows users, but I think that it should be conform our existing standards:
>
>- the production code can be changed through commits to the git repo,
>where our
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Curiously enough Pierre just said this in php.pecl.dev (Thu, 29 Aug 2013
> 19:59:01 +0200):
>>You can also get some here:
>>
>>http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/ snaps or releases
>>
>>which is about to be the place where pecl official bi
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there has been some chatter about windows.php.net, which drives me to
> the question: Do we need that site?
Yes. Totally and definitively yes.
> Why and for what?
>
> Few data items:
> * The "news" on w.p.n are not really
Ferenc Kovacs in php.internals (Sat, 31 Aug 2013 23:18:09 +0200):
>> PS. The beta for php.net has its problems as well. There is no
>> equivalent (yet?) for http://www.php.net/downloads.php
>> I switched back to the old site because of this.
>
>http://www.php.net/downloads.php?beta=1 ?
>maybe the l
> PS. The beta for php.net has its problems as well. There is no
> equivalent (yet?) for http://www.php.net/downloads.php
> I switched back to the old site because of this.
>
>
http://www.php.net/downloads.php?beta=1 ?
maybe the link is missing to that page?
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyra
Curiously enough Pierre just said this in php.pecl.dev (Thu, 29 Aug 2013
19:59:01 +0200):
>You can also get some here:
>
>http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/ snaps or releases
>
>which is about to be the place where pecl official binaries will be
>always be available, with links from pecl.php.ne
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there has been some chatter about windows.php.net, which drives me to
> the question: Do we need that site? Why and for what?
>
> Few data items:
> * The "news" on w.p.n are not really maintained and provide
> outda
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 22:38 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote:
> The Windows site also hosts DLLs for PECL:
> http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/ That should also be put in some
> prominent location, because right now I don't think it's even linked from
> anywhere. Instead the website has a notice that
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> My idea would be to
> * shut down most of windows.php.net
> * Provide downloads via our mirrors. This might need work on a
> nice downloads page, probably some configuration to make sure we
> comply to US cryp
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 13:22 -0700, Kris Craig wrote:
> The downloads section of windows.php.net is regularly updated. It
> currently hosts 5.3.3, released 10 days ago. The snaps and news are a bit
> outdated, but I'd say the solution to that is to encourage more
> participation, not shut it down
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there has been some chatter about windows.php.net, which drives me to
> the question: Do we need that site? Why and for what?
>
> Few data items:
> * The "news" on w.p.n are not really maintained and provide
> outdat
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there has been some chatter about windows.php.net, which drives me to
> the question: Do we need that site? Why and for what?
>
> Few data items:
> * The "news" on w.p.n are not really maintained and provide
> outdat
Hi,
there has been some chatter about windows.php.net, which drives me to
the question: Do we need that site? Why and for what?
Few data items:
* The "news" on w.p.n are not really maintained and provide
outdated info.
* Downloads are not using our 90 world-wide mirrors but a
27 matches
Mail list logo
