On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 21:24, Wez Furlong wrote:
> > And you're moving us into the support nightmare..
> > Instead of asking what php version they use, we need
> > to start asking which possible versions of different
> > extensions they happen to use, how they compiled them,
> >
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 21:21, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Wez Furlong wrote:
>
> >> it was actually my idea to for the oci8 stuff - and have some new
> >> maintainer maintain it in pecl.
> >
> >Yep, I remember.
> >
> >> i see no valid reason against it. he can start hacking on it (
> > The flip side is that we can provide them with a "localized"
> > (not in the i18n sense!) fix much sooner.
>
> The current snapshot system contains a patched version (after the fix is
> applied) within 2 hours at most for source distributions and 4 hours for
> win32 distributions.
By localized
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> > For this to work pear install needs to work first.
> > Try "pear install tidy" -> doesn't work, while "pear download tidy"
> > works fine. And as the pear installer has as much docs as the Zend
> > engine... I've no time/clue on where to start look
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 21:12:44 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -
> > "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll
> > > > ind
On December 9, 2003 03:24 pm, Wez Furlong wrote:
> The flip side is that we can provide them with a "localized"
> (not in the i18n sense!) fix much sooner.
The current snapshot system contains a patched version (after the fix is
applied) within 2 hours at most for source distributions and 4 hours
> >This isn't really a problem as you tend to mark all bug
> >reports as bogus anyway, and no one else provides support.
>
> Sorry, I forgot, of course the relevant bug categories will
> also be moved to http://pecl.php.net/bugs/.
>
> FYI: I don't mark all bug reports as bogus. Only
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Wez Furlong wrote:
>> And you're moving us into the support nightmare..
>> Instead of asking what php version they use, we need
>> to start asking which possible versions of different
>> extensions they happen to use, how they compiled them,
>> etc. etc. etc
> And you're moving us into the support nightmare..
> Instead of asking what php version they use, we need
> to start asking which possible versions of different
> extensions they happen to use, how they compiled them,
> etc. etc. etc.
The flip side is that we can provide them
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Wez Furlong wrote:
>> it was actually my idea to for the oci8 stuff - and have some new
>> maintainer maintain it in pecl.
>
>Yep, I remember.
>
>> i see no valid reason against it. he can start hacking on it (in pecl)
>> starting today - once he is comfortable with it we'll
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 21:12:44 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -
> > "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll
> > > > ind
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -
> "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll
> > > independent from the main-tree. (also - don't forget - not too many
> > > ppls use oracle, and those
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -
"Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll
> > independent from the main-tree. (also - don't forget - not too many
> > ppls use oracle, and those who do would be more than happy to get
> > new features/
> it was actually my idea to for the oci8 stuff - and have some new
> maintainer maintain it in pecl.
Yep, I remember.
> i see no valid reason against it. he can start hacking on it (in pecl)
> starting today - once he is comfortable with it we'll nuke the ext/oci
> and use(link, package) the
it was actually my idea to for the oci8 stuff - and have some new
maintainer maintain it in pecl.
i see no valid reason against it. he can start hacking on it (in pecl)
starting today - once he is comfortable with it we'll nuke the ext/oci
and use(link, package) the stuff from pecl.
loosing al
15 matches
Mail list logo
