On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 21:12:44 +0100 (CET) Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -0000 > > "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll > > > > independent from the main-tree. (also - don't forget - not too > > > > many ppls use oracle, and those who do would be more than happy > > > > to get new features/improvemnt from a new maintainer) > > > > > > This is precisely what I want to encourage in PECL. > > > > Fully aggreed (if that count ;) ). I really like the idea to work on > > package release basis in preference of "horrible" CVS tags ;). > > For this to work pear install <pecl package> needs to work first. Tomas and I asked many times the help of internals guys and posted a RFC for binary packages :). But I missed the install error, damnit :P > Try "pear install tidy" -> doesn't work, while "pear download tidy" > works fine. http://pear.php.net/bugs/ is a good start :-D > And as the pear installer has as much docs as the Zend > engine... I've no time/clue on where to start looking for the problem > ;-) docs? what's that? pierre -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
