gt;>
>> Cc: 'Adam Harvey' ; 'PHP internals'
>>
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements
>>
>> Hi Anatol,
>>
>> On 22.08.2015 at 16:52, Anatol Belski wrote:
>>
>>>> Would it be an acceptable compromise for everybody
Hi Christoph,
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2015 6:55 PM
> To: Anatol Belski ; 'Nikita Popov'
>
> Cc: 'Adam Harvey' ; 'PHP internals'
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] l
Hi Anatol,
On 22.08.2015 at 16:52, Anatol Belski wrote:
>> Would it be an acceptable compromise for everybody to stick with the current
>> *requirements* for now, but to document[1] that PCRE >= 8.10 is
>> *recommended* for PHP 5.6 and 7.0?
>>
> A documentation can never hurt. For the case the re
Hi Christoph,
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 11:30 PM
> To: Anatol Belski ; 'Nikita Popov'
>
> Cc: 'Adam Harvey' ; 'Christoph Becker'
> ; 'PHP internals
On 21.08.2015 at 22:37, Anatol Belski wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nikita Popov [mailto:nikita@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:14 PM
>> To: Anatol Belski
>> Cc: Adam Harvey ; Christoph Becker
>> ; PHP internals
>&
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikita Popov [mailto:nikita@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:14 PM
> To: Anatol Belski
> Cc: Adam Harvey ; Christoph Becker
> ; PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements
>
> On Fri, Aug
gt; > Cc: Anatol Belski ; PHP internals
> >
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements
> >
> > On 13 August 2015 at 04:35, Christoph Becker wrote:
> > > On 12.08.2015 at 08:44, Anatol Belski wrote:
> > >>
> > >> [...] However look -
&
> -Original Message-
> From: a...@adamharvey.name [mailto:a...@adamharvey.name] On Behalf
> Of Adam Harvey
> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 8:44 PM
> To: Christoph Becker
> Cc: Anatol Belski ; PHP internals
>
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirement
On 13 August 2015 at 04:35, Christoph Becker wrote:
> On 12.08.2015 at 08:44, Anatol Belski wrote:
>>
>> [...] However look -
>> http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/os-linux/all/all . From those,
>> CentOS 5/6 releases are not even a year old and contain 6.6, 7.x but take
>> 20% of all the
On 12.08.2015 at 08:44, Anatol Belski wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:09 PM
>> To: Anatol Belski ; 'PHP internals'
>>
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre ver
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:09 PM
> To: Anatol Belski ; 'PHP internals'
>
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements
>
> On 11.08.2015 at 22:46, Anatol Belski wr
On 11.08.2015 at 22:46, Anatol Belski wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 6:46 PM
>> To: PHP internals
>> Subject: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements
>>
>> W
On 11.08.2015 at 22:08, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
>> Distributions prefer to use system's libraries. I suppose question is if
>> PHP
>> supports older systems such as RHEL/CentOS 5 or not. They are used widely.
>> I prefer to support them if it
Hi Christoph,
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 6:46 PM
> To: PHP internals
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements
>
> Hi all!
>
> What is the minimum libpcre version th
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Distributions prefer to use system's libraries. I suppose question is if
> PHP
> supports older systems such as RHEL/CentOS 5 or not. They are used widely.
> I prefer to support them if it is possible/feasible. Features that are not
> support
Hi all,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Christoph Becker wrote:
> >> I'm asking because of bug #70232 which can easily be fixed, but that
> >> requires PCRE 8.00 (2009-10-19). If we have to support older PCRE
> >> versions, we'd probably need a fallback to the current behavior (which
> >> woul
On 11.08.2015 at 19:01, Adam Harvey wrote:
> On 11 August 2015 at 09:46, Christoph Becker wrote:
>> What is the minimum libpcre version that is supported as external
>> libpcre for ext/pcre? According to config0.m4 it is PCRE 6.6
>> (2006-02-06), but is this still valid and do we really have to
On 11 August 2015 at 09:46, Christoph Becker wrote:
> What is the minimum libpcre version that is supported as external
> libpcre for ext/pcre? According to config0.m4 it is PCRE 6.6
> (2006-02-06), but is this still valid and do we really have to support
> such old versions?
CentOS/RHEL 5 provi
Hi all!
What is the minimum libpcre version that is supported as external
libpcre for ext/pcre? According to config0.m4 it is PCRE 6.6
(2006-02-06), but is this still valid and do we really have to support
such old versions?
I'm asking because of bug #70232 which can easily be fixed, but that
re
19 matches
Mail list logo
